CALF vs. XSVM
CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CALF returned 3.80%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for XSVM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CALF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.
Performance
CALF vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 21.88% return.
CALF
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 30.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
XSVM
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- 42.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
CALF vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 14.10% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 21.88% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 7.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CALF and XSVM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between CALF and XSVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CALF vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CALF
XSVM
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Technology
CALF
XSVM
Consumer Cyclical
CALF
XSVM
Energy
CALF
XSVM
Healthcare
CALF
XSVM
Communication Services
CALF
XSVM
Industrials
CALF
XSVM
Consumer Defensive
CALF
XSVM
Real Estate
CALF
XSVM
Basic Materials
CALF
XSVM
Financial Services
CALF
XSVM
Utilities
CALF
-
XSVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CALF vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank
CALF
XSVM
CALF vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CALF | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 3.86 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.43 | 11.98 | +1.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CALF vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and XSVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALF | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.58% | -62.57% | +14.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -10.08% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | -26.21% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.22% | -26.21% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | 0.00% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -11.55% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 3.26% | -1.08% |
Volatility
CALF vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) have volatilities of 4.93% and 5.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CALF | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 5.09% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 12.03% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 18.60% | -2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 22.61% | +0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 25.08% | +0.91% |
CALF vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
CALF vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison
CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than XSVM's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.20% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.74% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CALF and XSVM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSVM has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to CALF (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs XSVM's -62.57%.
On 5-year performance, XSVM leads with 7.44% vs 3.80% for CALF. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 7.44% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.20% for CALF.
CALF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.37% for XSVM.
XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CALF and XSVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer