CALF vs. VGT
CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CALF returned 3.80%/yr vs 20.35%/yr for VGT. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CALF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
CALF vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return.
CALF
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 30.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 50.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
CALF vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 14.10% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 16.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between CALF and VGT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.55 |
The correlation between CALF and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CALF vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CALF
VGT
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CALF
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
CALF
VGT
Energy
CALF
VGT
Healthcare
CALF
VGT
Communication Services
CALF
VGT
Industrials
CALF
VGT
Consumer Defensive
CALF
VGT
-
Real Estate
CALF
VGT
-
Basic Materials
CALF
VGT
Financial Services
CALF
VGT
Utilities
CALF
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CALF vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
CALF
VGT
CALF vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CALF | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 2.94 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.43 | 9.11 | +4.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CALF vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALF | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.58% | -54.63% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -16.40% | +10.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | -27.23% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.22% | -35.07% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -7.18% | +5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -7.95% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 5.28% | -3.10% |
Volatility
CALF vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) is 4.93%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that CALF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CALF | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 10.00% | -5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 18.00% | -7.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 22.00% | -6.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 25.40% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 24.72% | +1.27% |
CALF vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CALF vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.20% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CALF and VGT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to CALF (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 20.35% vs 3.80% for CALF. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 20.35% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
CALF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CALF and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer