CALF vs. PSFF
CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) and PSFF (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while PSFF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer. CALF is passively managed, while PSFF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CALF returned 4.12%/yr vs 9.43%/yr for PSFF. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CALF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSFF.
Performance
CALF vs. PSFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 13.34% return, which is significantly higher than PSFF's 5.72% return.
CALF
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 30.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
PSFF
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 6.41%
- 1Y
- 14.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
CALF vs. PSFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 13.34% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | -0.41% |
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 5.72% | 10.38% | 13.18% | 18.39% | -4.11% | 11.81% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CALF and PSFF is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CALF and PSFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CALF vs. PSFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CALF
PSFF
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Technology
CALF
PSFF
Consumer Cyclical
CALF
PSFF
Energy
CALF
PSFF
Healthcare
CALF
PSFF
Communication Services
CALF
PSFF
Industrials
CALF
PSFF
Consumer Defensive
CALF
PSFF
Real Estate
CALF
PSFF
Basic Materials
CALF
PSFF
Financial Services
CALF
PSFF
Utilities
CALF
-
PSFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CALF vs. PSFF — Risk / Return Rank
CALF
PSFF
CALF vs. PSFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CALF | PSFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.47 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.94 | 4.08 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.08 | 20.44 | -6.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CALF | PSFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.49 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 1.03 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.11 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
CALF vs. PSFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, which is greater than PSFF's maximum drawdown of -10.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and PSFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALF | PSFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.58% | -10.78% | -36.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -3.67% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | -10.78% | -23.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.22% | -10.78% | -23.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -0.18% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -1.60% | -9.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 0.73% | +1.42% |
Volatility
CALF vs. PSFF - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that CALF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CALF | PSFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 1.02% | +3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | 4.54% | +5.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.84% | 6.08% | +9.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 9.22% | +14.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 9.10% | +16.92% |
CALF vs. PSFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PSFF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CALF vs. PSFF - Dividend Comparison
CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CALF and PSFF have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CALF has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to PSFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs PSFF's -10.78%.
On 5-year performance, PSFF leads with 9.43% vs 4.12% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PSFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSFF has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFF.
CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for PSFF.
CALF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while PSFF is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.75% for PSFF.
PSFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CALF and PSFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer