PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAIQ vs. QQMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAIQ vs. QQMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAIQ achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than QQMG's 15.67% return.


CAIQ

1D
-1.66%
1M
0.36%
YTD
11.17%
6M
10.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQMG

1D
-4.75%
1M
2.22%
YTD
15.67%
6M
13.99%
1Y
37.42%
3Y*
27.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAIQ vs. QQMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CAIQ
Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF
11.17%4.03%
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
15.67%4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CAIQ and QQMG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAIQ vs. QQMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAIQ

QQMG
QQMG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QQMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAIQ vs. QQMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CAIQ vs. QQMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAIQQQMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

0.68

+1.55

Drawdowns

CAIQ vs. QQMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAIQ drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, smaller than the maximum QQMG drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIQ and QQMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAIQQQMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-35.43%

+26.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-5.47%

+3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-9.60%

+7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

Volatility

CAIQ vs. QQMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAIQQQMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

17.47%

-3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

23.68%

-9.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.15%

23.68%

-9.53%

CAIQ vs. QQMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAIQ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QQMG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAIQ vs. QQMG - Dividend Comparison

CAIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.64%, more than QQMG's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CAIQ
Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF
8.64%1.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.35%0.41%0.50%0.60%0.82%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CAIQ and QQMG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.

CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.64%, compared with 0.35% for QQMG.

CAIQ tracks MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for CAIQ and 0.20% for QQMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAIQ and QQMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer