CAG vs. CHD
CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) and CHD (Church & Dwight Co., Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — CAG in Packaged Foods, CHD in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, CAG returned -5.11%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for CHD. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAG vs. CHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -10.31% return, which is significantly lower than CHD's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed CHD with an annualized return of -5.11%, while CHD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.
CAG
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- 6M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- -13.95%
- 3Y*
- -18.83%
- 5Y*
- -10.91%
- 10Y*
- -5.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.76%
CHD
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 0.53%
- 3Y*
- 0.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.03%
CAG vs. CHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | -10.31% | -33.32% | 1.46% | -22.82% | 17.52% | -2.55% | 8.69% | 65.50% | -41.99% | -2.55% |
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 14.92% | -18.91% | 11.96% | 18.72% | -20.41% | 18.89% | 25.46% | 8.36% | 33.23% | 15.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAG and CHD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 1986 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, CAG and CHD have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CAG:
$7.11B
CHD:
$22.68B
CAG:
-$4.00
CHD:
$3.04
CAG:
0.63
CHD:
3.72
CAG:
1.12
CHD:
5.45
CAG:
$11.28B
CHD:
$6.21B
CAG:
$2.70B
CHD:
$2.80B
CAG:
-$1.63B
CHD:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAG vs. CHD — Risk / Return Rank
CAG
CHD
CAG vs. CHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAG | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.02 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.03 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 0.06 | -0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAG vs. CHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, which is greater than CHD's maximum drawdown of -51.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and CHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAG | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -51.52% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.58% | -16.36% | -19.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.66% | -27.28% | -29.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.52% | -31.72% | -30.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.52% | -31.72% | -30.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.76% | -14.04% | -41.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.87% | -12.01% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.74% | 9.19% | +8.55% |
Volatility
CAG vs. CHD - Volatility Comparison
Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) at 7.63%. This indicates that CAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAG | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.68% | 7.63% | +5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.14% | 16.56% | +7.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.94% | 22.85% | +7.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 20.85% | +3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 21.92% | +4.59% |
Dividends
CAG vs. CHD - Dividend Comparison
CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, more than CHD's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 9.43% | 8.09% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 29.36% | 2.37% |
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 1.26% | 1.41% | 1.08% | 1.15% | 1.30% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.61% | 1.58% |
Financials
CAG vs. CHD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conagra Brands, Inc. and Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAG vs. CHD - Profitability Comparison
CAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 701.70M and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.
CHD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 681.40M and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.
CAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.63B and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of -91.2%.
CHD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 291.00M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.
CAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -1.62B and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of -56.1%.
CHD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a net income of 216.30M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAG and CHD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAG has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to CHD (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAG dropped -62.52% vs CHD's -51.52%.
CHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAG and CHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer