CAEIX vs. MBXIX
CAEIX (Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund) and MBXIX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - CAEIX is a Global Equities fund managed by Calvert, while MBXIX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, CAEIX returned 10.96%/yr vs 7.85%/yr for MBXIX. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CAEIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 2.04%/yr for MBXIX.
Performance
CAEIX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAEIX achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than MBXIX's 13.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CAEIX has outperformed MBXIX with an annualized return of 10.96%, while MBXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.
CAEIX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- 6M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 25.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.09%
MBXIX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 1Y
- 18.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CAEIX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 11.37% | 32.61% | -7.13% | 5.67% | -17.43% | 6.73% | 61.52% | 33.48% | -19.26% | 29.65% |
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I | 13.75% | 4.35% | 13.49% | -0.67% | 7.72% | 16.89% | -0.45% | 13.83% | -2.16% | 13.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAEIX and MBXIX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015 | 0.47 |
The correlation between CAEIX and MBXIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAEIX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank
CAEIX
MBXIX
CAEIX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAEIX | MBXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.45 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 4.29 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 16.67 | -10.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAEIX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAEIX drawdown since its inception was -75.81%, which is greater than MBXIX's maximum drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAEIX and MBXIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAEIX | MBXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.81% | -31.73% | -44.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -3.85% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.01% | -15.59% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.58% | -15.59% | -16.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.54% | -31.73% | -5.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.53% | -1.96% | -7.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.27% | -3.95% | -44.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 1.01% | +2.76% |
Volatility
CAEIX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.78%. This indicates that CAEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAEIX | MBXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 1.78% | +3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.74% | 4.94% | +9.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 6.93% | +10.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 11.40% | +8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 13.36% | +6.20% |
CAEIX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAEIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAEIX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison
CAEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 0.65% | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.07% | 0.86% | 0.49% | 0.82% | 1.23% | 2.00% | 1.40% | 1.79% | 0.72% |
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.63% | 2.25% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 4.27% | 5.18% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 1.91% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAEIX and MBXIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAEIX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to MBXIX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAEIX dropped -75.81% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.
MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAEIX and MBXIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer