PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAEIX vs. CFICX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAEIX vs. CFICX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and Calvert Income Fund (CFICX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAEIX achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly higher than CFICX's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CAEIX has outperformed CFICX with an annualized return of 11.99%, while CFICX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.92% annualized return.


CAEIX

1D
-2.66%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
15.38%
6M
14.32%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
11.99%

CFICX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.59%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
2.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAEIX vs. CFICX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
15.38%32.61%-7.13%5.67%-17.43%6.73%61.52%33.48%-19.26%29.65%
CFICX
Calvert Income Fund
0.26%8.94%4.11%7.61%-16.07%1.71%8.26%14.75%-3.36%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CAEIX and CFICX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

-0.02

The correlation between CAEIX and CFICX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAEIX vs. CFICX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAEIX
CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

CFICX
CFICX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CFICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFICX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CFICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFICX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAEIX vs. CFICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and Calvert Income Fund (CFICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAEIXCFICXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

1.69

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.31

5.33

+8.98

CAEIX vs. CFICX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAEIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the CFICX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAEIX and CFICX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAEIX vs. CFICX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAEIX drawdown since its inception was -75.81%, which is greater than CFICX's maximum drawdown of -21.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAEIX and CFICX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAEIXCFICXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.81%

-21.28%

-54.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-3.08%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.57%

-6.11%

-18.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.58%

-21.28%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.54%

-21.28%

-16.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.28%

-1.41%

-4.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.50%

-3.45%

-45.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

0.97%

+1.68%

Volatility

CAEIX vs. CFICX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) at 1.25%. This indicates that CAEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAEIXCFICXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

1.25%

+5.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

2.93%

+11.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.40%

3.70%

+13.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.37%

5.65%

+13.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

5.23%

+14.38%

CAEIX vs. CFICX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAEIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CFICX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAEIX vs. CFICX - Dividend Comparison

CAEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than CFICX's 4.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
0.62%0.72%1.17%1.07%0.86%0.49%0.82%1.23%2.00%1.40%1.79%0.72%
CFICX
Calvert Income Fund
4.76%4.86%4.91%4.05%3.22%2.70%2.96%3.25%3.60%2.96%3.23%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAEIX and CFICX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAEIX has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to CFICX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAEIX dropped -75.81% vs CFICX's -21.28%.

CAEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAEIX and CFICX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer