CFICX vs. PTTPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) and PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 (PTTPX).
CFICX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Oct 12, 1982. PTTPX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Apr 30, 2008.
Performance
CFICX vs. PTTPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFICX vs. PTTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFICX Calvert Income Fund | -0.99% | 8.94% | 4.11% | 7.61% | -16.07% | 1.71% | 8.26% | 14.75% | -3.36% | 6.57% |
PTTPX PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 | -1.03% | 9.24% | 2.51% | 5.47% | -14.80% | -0.70% | 8.78% | 8.26% | -0.35% | 5.03% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CFICX having a -0.99% return and PTTPX slightly lower at -1.03%. Over the past 10 years, CFICX has outperformed PTTPX with an annualized return of 3.07%, while PTTPX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.06% annualized return.
CFICX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.07%
PTTPX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFICX vs. PTTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFICX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than PTTPX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFICX vs. PTTPX — Risk / Return Rank
CFICX
PTTPX
CFICX vs. PTTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) and PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 (PTTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFICX | PTTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 0.98 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 1.39 | +0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.18 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 1.53 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.67 | 4.55 | +3.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFICX | PTTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 0.98 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.07 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.40 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.71 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFICX and PTTPX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CFICX vs. PTTPX - Dividend Comparison
CFICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than PTTPX's 4.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFICX Calvert Income Fund | 4.51% | 4.86% | 4.91% | 4.05% | 3.22% | 2.70% | 2.96% | 3.25% | 3.60% | 2.96% | 3.23% | 2.87% |
PTTPX PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 | 4.04% | 4.37% | 4.51% | 3.04% | 3.53% | 2.48% | 6.01% | 3.87% | 3.02% | 2.53% | 2.92% | 6.54% |
Drawdowns
CFICX vs. PTTPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFICX drawdown since its inception was -21.28%, which is greater than PTTPX's maximum drawdown of -19.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFICX and PTTPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFICX | PTTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -19.36% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.08% | -3.67% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.28% | -19.36% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.28% | -19.36% | -1.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -3.11% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -3.18% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 1.23% | -0.43% |
Volatility
CFICX vs. PTTPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) is 1.51%, while PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 (PTTPX) has a volatility of 2.04%. This indicates that CFICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFICX | PTTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 2.04% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.36% | 2.98% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 5.14% | -1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 6.19% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 5.17% | +0.03% |