CFICX vs. MNHYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX).
CFICX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Oct 12, 1982. MNHYX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 2009.
Performance
CFICX vs. MNHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFICX vs. MNHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFICX Calvert Income Fund | -0.73% | 8.94% | 4.11% | 7.61% | -16.07% | 1.71% | 8.26% | 14.75% | -3.36% | 6.57% |
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | -0.59% | 6.65% | 9.63% | 13.19% | -7.59% | 9.99% | 6.26% | 13.99% | -1.30% | 8.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFICX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than MNHYX's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CFICX has underperformed MNHYX with an annualized return of 3.10%, while MNHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.65% annualized return.
CFICX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
MNHYX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 5.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFICX vs. MNHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFICX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than MNHYX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFICX vs. MNHYX — Risk / Return Rank
CFICX
MNHYX
CFICX vs. MNHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFICX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 1.91 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.33 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 1.49 | +0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.45 | 5.83 | +1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFICX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 1.48 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 1.61 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 1.80 | -0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFICX and MNHYX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CFICX vs. MNHYX - Dividend Comparison
CFICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than MNHYX's 6.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFICX Calvert Income Fund | 4.50% | 4.86% | 4.91% | 4.05% | 3.22% | 2.70% | 2.96% | 3.25% | 3.60% | 2.96% | 3.23% | 2.87% |
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | 6.89% | 6.95% | 6.38% | 6.66% | 5.93% | 7.93% | 4.98% | 6.63% | 5.26% | 5.16% | 6.49% | 5.60% |
Drawdowns
CFICX vs. MNHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFICX drawdown since its inception was -21.28%, which is greater than MNHYX's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFICX and MNHYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFICX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -19.70% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.08% | -3.38% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.28% | -10.84% | -10.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.28% | -19.70% | -1.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -1.69% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -1.57% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 0.86% | -0.05% |
Volatility
CFICX vs. MNHYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) is 1.51%, while Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) has a volatility of 1.62%. This indicates that CFICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFICX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 1.62% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.36% | 2.12% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 3.68% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 3.67% | +1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.21% | 4.15% | +1.06% |