PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAA vs. CG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRAA vs. CG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) and The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAA achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly higher than CG's -21.07% return. Over the past 10 years, PRAA has underperformed CG with an annualized return of -4.37%, while CG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.81% annualized return.


PRAA

1D
0.12%
1M
-4.98%
6M
35.81%
YTD
-1.81%
1Y
15.34%
3Y*
-9.56%
5Y*
-14.84%
10Y*
-4.37%
ALL TIME*
5.55%

CG

1D
1.46%
1M
7.45%
6M
-20.62%
YTD
-21.07%
1Y
-19.55%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
15.81%
ALL TIME*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$125.47M$119.43M$152.66M
$6.27M$5.90M$10.72M

PRAA vs. CG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRAA
PRA Group, Inc.
-1.81%-15.32%-20.27%-22.44%-32.72%26.60%9.26%48.95%-26.60%-15.09%
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
-21.07%20.20%28.05%42.55%-43.78%78.46%1.62%116.75%-27.28%59.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAA and CG is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2012

0.35

The correlation between PRAA and CG shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRAA:

$662.51M

CG:

$16.57B

EPS

PRAA:

-$7.21

CG:

$1.48

PS Ratio

PRAA:

0.53

CG:

4.27

PB Ratio

PRAA:

0.67

CG:

2.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRAA:

$1.28B

CG:

$3.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRAA:

$1.31B

CG:

$2.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRAA:

-$47.90M

CG:

$1.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRAA vs. CG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRAA
PRAA Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PRAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAA Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAA Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CG
CG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRAA vs. CG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) and The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRAACGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.92

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

-0.55

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.79

-0.95

+1.74

PRAA vs. CG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAA Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the CG Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAA and CG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRAA vs. CG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAA drawdown since its inception was -83.83%, which is greater than CG's maximum drawdown of -62.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAA and CG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAACGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.83%

-62.69%

-21.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.34%

-40.36%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.79%

-40.36%

-22.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.35%

-56.75%

-22.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.35%

-56.75%

-22.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.05%

-32.27%

-40.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.52%

-21.87%

-10.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.08%

23.42%

-5.34%

Volatility

PRAA vs. CG - Volatility Comparison

PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) has a higher volatility of 13.36% compared to The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) at 8.71%. This indicates that PRAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRAACGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.36%

8.71%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.75%

27.96%

+17.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.06%

36.50%

+22.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.30%

39.88%

+10.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.75%

37.46%

+9.29%

Dividends

PRAA vs. CG - Dividend Comparison

PRAA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
3.04%2.37%2.77%3.38%4.11%1.82%3.18%4.24%7.87%5.41%11.02%21.70%
PRAA
PRA Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PRAA vs. CG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PRA Group, Inc. and The Carlyle Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PRAA and CG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRAA has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to CG (8.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRAA dropped -83.83% vs CG's -62.69%.

PRAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRAA and CG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer