CABZ vs. NVDW

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CABZ (Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF) and NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CABZ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while NVDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CABZ charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVDW.

Performance

CABZ vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CABZ

• 1D: -6.81%
• 1M: -3.07%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDW

• 1D: -6.93%
• 1M: -1.78%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 13.06%
• 1Y: 50.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CABZ vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CABZ Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF	-4.23%
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF	12.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CABZ and NVDW is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026	0.61

Return for Risk

CABZ vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDW

NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 36
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 33
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CABZ vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CABZ	NVDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	1.29	-1.60

Drawdowns

CABZ vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABZ drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, smaller than the maximum NVDW drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABZ and NVDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CABZ	NVDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.48%	-25.54%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-25.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.64%	-15.17%	+5.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.47%	-8.22%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CABZ	NVDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	31.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.64%	41.68%	-8.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.64%	41.64%	-8.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.64%	41.64%	-8.00%

CABZ vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CABZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CABZ vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison

CABZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.25%.

Position	TTM	2025
CABZ Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF	0.00%	0.00%
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF	61.25%	38.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CABZ and NVDW in my portfolio?

CABZ and NVDW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CABZ or NVDW?

On fees, CABZ is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CABZ or NVDW?

CABZ is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CABZ or NVDW?

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 61.25%, compared with 0.00% for CABZ.

What is the main difference between CABZ and NVDW?

CABZ is categorized as Technology Equities, while NVDW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CABZ and 0.99% for NVDW.