PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CABZ vs. MAGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CABZ vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CABZ

1D
-6.81%
1M
-3.07%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGY

1D
-3.74%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
-4.07%
6M
-4.07%
1Y
12.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CABZ vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CABZ and MAGY is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026

0.64

CABZ vs. MAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CABZ
MAGY

Technology

52.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

35.8%

-

Communication Services

12.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

99.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CABZ
52.2%
MAGY

-

Consumer Cyclical

CABZ
35.8%
MAGY

-

Communication Services

CABZ
12.0%
MAGY

-

Basic Materials

CABZ

-

MAGY

-

Consumer Defensive

CABZ

-

MAGY

-

Energy

CABZ

-

MAGY

-

Financial Services

CABZ

-

MAGY
99.9%

Healthcare

CABZ

-

MAGY

-

Industrials

CABZ

-

MAGY

-

Real Estate

CABZ

-

MAGY

-

Utilities

CABZ

-

MAGY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CABZ vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CABZ

MAGY
MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CABZ vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CABZ vs. MAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CABZMAGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

1.28

-1.60

Drawdowns

CABZ vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABZ drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABZ and MAGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CABZMAGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.48%

-14.29%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.64%

-6.16%

-3.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-2.71%

-5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

Volatility

CABZ vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CABZMAGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.64%

14.91%

+18.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.64%

15.00%

+18.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.64%

15.00%

+18.64%

CABZ vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CABZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CABZ vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison

CABZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.03%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CABZ and MAGY have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CABZ is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CABZ is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.

MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 39.03%, compared with 0.00% for CABZ.

CABZ is categorized as Technology Equities, while MAGY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CABZ and 0.99% for MAGY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CABZ and MAGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer