CABA vs. QQQI
CABA (Cabaletta Bio, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, CABA returned 64.22% vs 30.41% for QQQI. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CABA vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CABA achieves a 63.47% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 13.43% return.
CABA
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -6.53%
- YTD
- 63.47%
- 6M
- 43.20%
- 1Y
- 64.22%
- 3Y*
- -31.52%
- 5Y*
- -18.46%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 30.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CABA vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CABA Cabaletta Bio, Inc. | 63.47% | -3.52% | -89.27% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.43% | 18.62% | 19.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CABA and QQQI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CABA vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
CABA
QQQI
CABA vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CABA | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.43 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 3.18 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | 14.27 | -11.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CABA | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 2.35 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 1.34 | -1.47 |
Drawdowns
CABA vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CABA drawdown since its inception was -96.63%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABA and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CABA | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.63% | -20.00% | -76.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.37% | -9.61% | -36.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.89% | -0.17% | -85.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.66% | -2.20% | -57.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.65% | 2.14% | +24.51% |
Volatility
CABA vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA) has a higher volatility of 21.67% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.68%. This indicates that CABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CABA | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.67% | 2.68% | +18.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.03% | 9.85% | +51.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.82% | 12.98% | +95.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.62% | 17.07% | +96.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.69% | 17.07% | +92.62% |
Dividends
CABA vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
CABA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CABA Cabaletta Bio, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.19% | 13.82% | 12.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CABA and QQQI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CABA has higher volatility (21.67%) compared to QQQI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CABA dropped -96.63% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CABA and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer