CAAMX vs. OPGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Select Risk: Moderately Conservative Investor Fund (CAAMX) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX).
CAAMX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Apr 28, 2005. OPGSX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jul 18, 1983.
Performance
CAAMX vs. OPGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CAAMX vs. OPGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAAMX Invesco Select Risk: Moderately Conservative Investor Fund | -0.04% | 11.19% | 6.17% | 9.83% | -16.68% | 7.30% | 10.23% | 14.41% | -4.51% | 6.31% |
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund | 6.89% | 131.03% | 13.05% | 6.35% | -16.86% | -2.75% | 36.15% | 46.37% | -13.15% | 17.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAAMX achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than OPGSX's 6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CAAMX has underperformed OPGSX with an annualized return of 4.51%, while OPGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.10% annualized return.
CAAMX
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 10.66%
- 3Y*
- 7.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
OPGSX
- 1D
- 6.42%
- 1M
- -19.81%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 19.86%
- 1Y
- 93.74%
- 3Y*
- 39.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.64%
- 10Y*
- 18.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CAAMX vs. OPGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAAMX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than OPGSX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CAAMX vs. OPGSX — Risk / Return Rank
CAAMX
OPGSX
CAAMX vs. OPGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Select Risk: Moderately Conservative Investor Fund (CAAMX) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAAMX | OPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 2.49 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.77 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.40 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 3.94 | -2.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.06 | 15.50 | -7.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAAMX | OPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 2.49 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.64 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.56 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.26 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between CAAMX and OPGSX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CAAMX vs. OPGSX - Dividend Comparison
CAAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than OPGSX's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAAMX Invesco Select Risk: Moderately Conservative Investor Fund | 3.00% | 2.90% | 2.44% | 1.73% | 4.57% | 5.03% | 7.84% | 6.43% | 4.05% | 1.71% | 2.46% | 2.77% |
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund | 0.40% | 0.43% | 0.86% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 3.56% | 1.55% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 2.78% | 7.21% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CAAMX vs. OPGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAAMX drawdown since its inception was -29.13%, smaller than the maximum OPGSX drawdown of -80.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAAMX and OPGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAAMX | OPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.13% | -80.04% | +50.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.64% | -29.01% | +23.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.18% | -47.09% | +24.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.18% | -47.09% | +24.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.41% | -19.81% | +16.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -29.33% | +24.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 7.38% | -6.06% |
Volatility
CAAMX vs. OPGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Select Risk: Moderately Conservative Investor Fund (CAAMX) is 3.04%, while Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) has a volatility of 16.75%. This indicates that CAAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CAAMX | OPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 16.75% | -13.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.03% | 35.48% | -30.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.00% | 43.40% | -35.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.77% | 33.09% | -25.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.52% | 32.99% | -25.47% |