C001.DE vs. IBCJ.DE
C001.DE (Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist) and IBCJ.DE (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - C001.DE tracks the DAX® while IBCJ.DE tracks the MSCI Poland. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, C001.DE returned 8.91%/yr vs 9.17%/yr for IBCJ.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. C001.DE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IBCJ.DE.
Performance
C001.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C001.DE achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than IBCJ.DE's 16.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with C001.DE having a 8.91% annualized return and IBCJ.DE not far ahead at 9.17%.
C001.DE
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
IBCJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 25.77%
- 1Y
- 38.98%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
C001.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C001.DE Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist | 1.38% | 22.63% | 18.38% | 19.46% | -12.82% | 15.35% | 3.10% | 24.61% | -18.48% | 12.20% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.30% | 53.66% | -0.42% | 43.86% | -21.74% | 14.34% | -18.69% | -3.73% | -9.07% | 35.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between C001.DE and IBCJ.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011 | 0.57 |
The correlation between C001.DE and IBCJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C001.DE vs. IBCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
C001.DE
IBCJ.DE
C001.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C001.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.28 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 3.90 | -3.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | 9.60 | -9.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C001.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 1.65 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.55 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.36 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.15 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
C001.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C001.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.60%, smaller than the maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C001.DE and IBCJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C001.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.60% | -56.11% | +14.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -9.96% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.88% | -18.47% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | -47.31% | +20.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.62% | -56.11% | +17.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -1.16% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -19.38% | +11.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 4.05% | -0.08% |
Volatility
C001.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) is 5.16%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that C001.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C001.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 7.13% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | 17.61% | -4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 23.48% | -7.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 26.72% | -9.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 25.15% | -6.91% |
C001.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
C001.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCJ.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
C001.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
C001.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while IBCJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C001.DE Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist | 1.99% | 2.02% | 2.17% | 3.04% | 2.72% | 1.91% | 2.36% | 2.52% | 3.10% | 2.72% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C001.DE and IBCJ.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, C001.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C001.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
C001.DE tracks DAX®, while IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for C001.DE and 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for C001.DE and IBCJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer