C001.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

C001.DE (Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist) and H4ZZ.DE (HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - C001.DE tracks the DAX® while H4ZZ.DE tracks the EURO STOXX 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, C001.DE returned 6.01% vs 22.41% for H4ZZ.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. C001.DE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for H4ZZ.DE.

Performance

C001.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C001.DE achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than H4ZZ.DE's 10.19% return.

C001.DE

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 6.01%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 9.35%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

H4ZZ.DE

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 10.19%
• 6M: 11.16%
• 1Y: 22.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C001.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
C001.DE Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist	1.66%	22.63%	7.57%
H4ZZ.DE HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	10.19%	22.35%	-2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between C001.DE and H4ZZ.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2024	0.92

The correlation between C001.DE and H4ZZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

C001.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C001.DE

C001.DE Risk / Return Rank: 14
C001.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
C001.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
C001.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 13
C001.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
C001.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 16

H4ZZ.DE

H4ZZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 45
H4ZZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
H4ZZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
H4ZZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 43
H4ZZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
H4ZZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C001.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	C001.DE	H4ZZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	1.40	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	2.11	-1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.26	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	2.04	-1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.51	7.07	-5.56

C001.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C001.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the H4ZZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C001.DE and H4ZZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

C001.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C001.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.59%, which is greater than H4ZZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C001.DE and H4ZZ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	C001.DE	H4ZZ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.59%	-16.46%	-27.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.33%	-10.94%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-0.83%	-1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.54%	-2.66%	-5.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.97%	3.16%	+0.81%

Volatility

C001.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE) have volatilities of 3.49% and 3.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	C001.DE	H4ZZ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	3.53%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.04%	13.18%	-0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.98%	15.98%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.08%	16.81%	+0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.04%	16.81%	+1.23%

C001.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C001.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZZ.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

C001.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

C001.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while H4ZZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
C001.DE Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist	1.99%	2.02%	2.17%	3.04%	2.72%	1.91%	2.36%	2.52%	3.10%	2.72%
H4ZZ.DE HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both C001.DE and H4ZZ.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, C001.DE and H4ZZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, C001.DE or H4ZZ.DE?

On fees, H4ZZ.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, C001.DE or H4ZZ.DE?

H4ZZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for C001.DE.

What is the main difference between C001.DE and H4ZZ.DE?

C001.DE tracks DAX®, while H4ZZ.DE tracks EURO STOXX 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for C001.DE and 0.05% for H4ZZ.DE.