C001.DE vs. CEMS.DE
C001.DE (Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist) and CEMS.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - C001.DE tracks the DAX® while CEMS.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, C001.DE returned 8.91%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for CEMS.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. C001.DE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CEMS.DE.
Performance
C001.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C001.DE achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than CEMS.DE's 13.72% return. Over the past 10 years, C001.DE has underperformed CEMS.DE with an annualized return of 8.91%, while CEMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.71% annualized return.
C001.DE
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
CEMS.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 32.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 14.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
C001.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C001.DE Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist | 1.38% | 22.63% | 18.38% | 19.46% | -12.82% | 15.35% | 3.10% | 24.61% | -18.48% | 12.20% |
CEMS.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF | 13.72% | 35.97% | 9.93% | 13.90% | -4.54% | 26.62% | -8.86% | 23.48% | -14.04% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between C001.DE and CEMS.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015 | 0.88 |
The correlation between C001.DE and CEMS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C001.DE vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
C001.DE
CEMS.DE
C001.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C001.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.43 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 3.29 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | 12.37 | -11.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C001.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 2.37 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.94 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.61 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.49 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
C001.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C001.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.60%, roughly equal to the maximum CEMS.DE drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C001.DE and CEMS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C001.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.60% | -40.20% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -9.99% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.88% | -17.57% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | -19.55% | -7.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.62% | -40.20% | +1.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -1.26% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -7.49% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 2.66% | +1.31% |
Volatility
C001.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) at 4.65%. This indicates that C001.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C001.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 4.65% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | 11.17% | +1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 13.87% | +2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 15.23% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 17.43% | +0.81% |
C001.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
C001.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
C001.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
C001.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while CEMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C001.DE Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist | 1.99% | 2.02% | 2.17% | 3.04% | 2.72% | 1.91% | 2.36% | 2.52% | 3.10% | 2.72% |
CEMS.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C001.DE and CEMS.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, C001.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C001.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMS.DE.
C001.DE tracks DAX®, while CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for C001.DE and 0.25% for CEMS.DE.
Find the right allocation for C001.DE and CEMS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer