PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C001.DE vs. 5HEU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

C001.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


C001.DE

1D
1.12%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
1.66%
6M
2.43%
1Y
6.01%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
9.91%

5HEU.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C001.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
C001.DE
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist
1.66%22.63%18.38%19.46%-12.74%1.56%
5HEU.DE
Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector UCITS ETF (EUR)
0.00%4.88%-2.91%6.26%-8.70%2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between C001.DE and 5HEU.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between C001.DE and 5HEU.DE has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C001.DE vs. 5HEU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C001.DE
C001.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
C001.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C001.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
C001.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
C001.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
C001.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

5HEU.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C001.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


C001.DE5HEU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

C001.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

C001.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


C001.DE5HEU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

Volatility

C001.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


C001.DE5HEU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

C001.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C001.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than 5HEU.DE's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

C001.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Dividend Comparison

C001.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while 5HEU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
5HEU.DE
Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector UCITS ETF (EUR)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
C001.DE
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist
1.99%2.02%2.17%3.04%2.72%1.91%2.36%2.52%3.10%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


C001.DE and 5HEU.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, C001.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

C001.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HEU.DE.

C001.DE tracks DAX®, while 5HEU.DE tracks Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for C001.DE and 0.75% for 5HEU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C001.DE and 5HEU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer