BYRN vs. FLNC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC).

Performance

BYRN vs. FLNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BYRN vs. FLNC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BYRN Byrna Technologies Inc.	-45.32%	-41.72%	350.86%	-18.49%	-41.27%	-20.35%
FLNC Fluence Energy, Inc.	-30.43%	24.56%	-33.42%	39.07%	-51.77%	1.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BYRN : $220.48M FLNC : $1.81B
EPS BYRN : $0.40 FLNC : -$0.31
PS Ratio BYRN : 1.87 FLNC : 0.90
PB Ratio BYRN : 3.35 FLNC : 4.66
Total Revenue (TTM) BYRN : $118.12M FLNC : $2.55B
Gross Profit (TTM) BYRN : $71.47M FLNC : $297.63M
EBITDA (TTM) BYRN : $13.46M FLNC : -$28.21M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYRN achieves a -45.32% return, which is significantly lower than FLNC's -30.43% return.

BYRN

• 1D: 3.73%
• 1M: -28.17%
• YTD: -45.32%
• 6M: -58.57%
• 1Y: -45.49%
• 3Y*: 6.55%
• 5Y*: -6.29%
• 10Y*: 33.78%

FLNC

• 1D: 5.85%
• 1M: -11.45%
• YTD: -30.43%
• 6M: 27.41%
• 1Y: 183.71%
• 3Y*: -12.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BYRN vs. FLNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYRN

BYRN Risk / Return Rank: 18
BYRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BYRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BYRN Omega Ratio Rank: 17
BYRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BYRN Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FLNC

FLNC Risk / Return Rank: 85
FLNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FLNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FLNC Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FLNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FLNC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYRN vs. FLNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BYRN	FLNC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	1.67	-2.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.76	2.39	-3.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.31	-0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.63	2.95	-3.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	7.26	-8.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BYRN vs. FLNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the FLNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYRN and FLNC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BYRN	FLNC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.65	1.67	-2.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	-0.20	+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between BYRN and FLNC is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BYRN vs. FLNC - Dividend Comparison

Neither BYRN nor FLNC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BYRN vs. FLNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYRN drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, roughly equal to the maximum FLNC drawdown of -90.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYRN and FLNC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BYRN	FLNC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.51%	-90.40%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-73.78%	-59.66%	-14.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.15%	-63.41%	-9.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.99%	-53.81%	+1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.24%	24.27%	+16.97%

Volatility

BYRN vs. FLNC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) is 16.55%, while Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) has a volatility of 22.32%. This indicates that BYRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BYRN	FLNC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.55%	22.32%	-5.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.57%	89.09%	-44.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.18%	110.63%	-40.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.38%	93.74%	-21.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	168.26%	93.74%	+74.52%

Financials

BYRN vs. FLNC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Byrna Technologies Inc. and Fluence Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BYRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.06M and revenue of 35.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.8%.

FLNC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fluence Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 23.05M and revenue of 475.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.9%.

BYRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 3.95M and revenue of 35.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

FLNC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fluence Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -59.37M and revenue of 475.23M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.5%.

BYRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 3.36M and revenue of 35.25M, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.

FLNC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fluence Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -45.07M and revenue of 475.23M, resulting in a net margin of -9.5%.