BYRN vs. CLMB
BYRN (Byrna Technologies Inc.) and CLMB (Climb Global Solutions) are both stocks. BYRN operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while CLMB operates in Electronics & Computer Distribution (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BYRN returned 10.22%/yr vs 20.23%/yr for CLMB. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BYRN vs. CLMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYRN achieves a -62.18% return, which is significantly lower than CLMB's -11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BYRN has underperformed CLMB with an annualized return of 10.22%, while CLMB has yielded a comparatively higher 20.23% annualized return.
BYRN
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 27.00%
- YTD
- -62.18%
- 6M
- -66.08%
- 1Y
- -79.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- -23.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
CLMB
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- 18.10%
- YTD
- -11.90%
- 6M
- -16.09%
- 1Y
- -14.36%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 28.87%
- 10Y*
- 20.23%
BYRN vs. CLMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYRN Byrna Technologies Inc. | -62.18% | -41.72% | 350.86% | -18.49% | -41.27% | -7.93% | 663.16% | 26.67% | 7.14% | -30.00% |
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | -11.90% | -18.40% | 133.60% | 76.59% | -8.29% | 88.47% | 22.14% | 70.90% | -37.08% | -7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYRN and CLMB is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2011 | 0.07 |
The correlation between BYRN and CLMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BYRN:
$151.32M
CLMB:
$412.41M
BYRN:
$0.37
CLMB:
$1.16
BYRN:
17.25
CLMB:
19.59
BYRN:
1.26
CLMB:
0.59
BYRN:
2.28
CLMB:
3.48
BYRN:
$120.98M
CLMB:
$696.85M
BYRN:
$72.95M
CLMB:
$108.37M
BYRN:
$12.75M
CLMB:
$35.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYRN vs. CLMB — Risk / Return Rank
BYRN
CLMB
BYRN vs. CLMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and Climb Global Solutions (CLMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BYRN | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 0.99 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.27 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | -0.55 | -0.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BYRN vs. CLMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYRN drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, roughly equal to the maximum CLMB drawdown of -89.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYRN and CLMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYRN | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -89.12% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.22% | -53.40% | -31.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -85.49% | -53.40% | -32.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.51% | -53.40% | -39.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.51% | -53.40% | -39.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.43% | -36.75% | -44.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.36% | -32.23% | -20.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.16% | 26.18% | +28.98% |
Volatility
BYRN vs. CLMB - Volatility Comparison
Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a higher volatility of 17.02% compared to Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) at 11.13%. This indicates that BYRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYRN | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.02% | 11.13% | +5.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.78% | 40.87% | +18.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.16% | 52.25% | +21.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.23% | 45.77% | +27.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.32% | 40.90% | +54.42% |
Dividends
BYRN vs. CLMB - Dividend Comparison
BYRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYRN Byrna Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | 0.38% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 1.24% | 2.16% | 1.94% | 3.56% | 4.20% | 6.80% | 4.07% | 3.64% | 3.71% |
Financials
BYRN vs. CLMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Byrna Technologies Inc. and Climb Global Solutions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BYRN vs. CLMB - Profitability Comparison
BYRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.40M and revenue of 29.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
CLMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a gross profit of 26.50M and revenue of 182.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.5%.
BYRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 928.00K and revenue of 29.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
CLMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported an operating income of 3.88M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
BYRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 801.00K and revenue of 29.05M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
CLMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a net income of 3.33M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BYRN and CLMB have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYRN has higher volatility (17.02%) compared to CLMB (11.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYRN dropped -92.51% vs CLMB's -89.12%.
CLMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BYRN and CLMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer