PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYDDY vs. GWW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BYDDY vs. GWW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYDDY achieves a -8.48% return, which is significantly lower than GWW's 30.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BYDDY having a 20.45% annualized return and GWW not far ahead at 21.41%.


BYDDY

1D
0.66%
1M
-13.95%
YTD
-8.48%
6M
-10.33%
1Y
-36.06%
3Y*
1.04%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
20.45%

GWW

1D
0.15%
1M
5.03%
YTD
30.92%
6M
29.19%
1Y
22.72%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
24.71%
10Y*
21.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYDDY vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYDDY
BYD Company Limited ADR
-8.48%7.97%24.81%13.06%-27.17%28.02%432.95%-21.04%-27.71%69.09%
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
30.92%-3.41%28.21%50.53%8.75%28.80%22.85%22.25%21.69%4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BYDDY and GWW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2008

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BYDDY:

$100.56B

GWW:

$62.37B

EPS

BYDDY:

CN¥3.03

GWW:

$37.26

PE Ratio

BYDDY:

24.67

GWW:

35.32

PEG Ratio

BYDDY:

0.18

GWW:

2.04

PS Ratio

BYDDY:

0.87

GWW:

3.42

PB Ratio

BYDDY:

2.73

GWW:

15.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

BYDDY:

CN¥779.53B

GWW:

$18.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BYDDY:

CN¥132.63B

GWW:

$7.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

BYDDY:

CN¥33.66B

GWW:

$2.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYDDY vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYDDY
BYDDY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BYDDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYDDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYDDY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BYDDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYDDY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GWW
GWW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWW Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYDDY vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYDDYGWWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.19

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.03

1.64

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.59

3.20

-4.79

BYDDY vs. GWW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYDDY Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the GWW Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYDDY and GWW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYDDY vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYDDY drawdown since its inception was -97.38%, which is greater than GWW's maximum drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDDY and GWW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYDDYGWWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.38%

-56.73%

-40.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.21%

-13.92%

-21.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.68%

-24.50%

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.16%

-24.50%

-23.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.18%

-41.60%

-16.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.25%

-1.05%

-42.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.73%

-11.01%

-52.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.19%

7.61%

+16.58%

Volatility

BYDDY vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison

BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) has a higher volatility of 8.66% compared to W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) at 4.85%. This indicates that BYDDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYDDYGWWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.66%

4.85%

+3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.41%

17.85%

+10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.02%

24.78%

+12.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.80%

24.68%

+21.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.24%

28.52%

+18.72%

Dividends

BYDDY vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison

BYDDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than GWW's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYDDY
BYD Company Limited ADR
0.48%1.45%1.26%0.60%0.07%0.07%0.03%0.47%0.28%0.52%1.92%0.00%
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.70%0.88%0.76%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%

Financials

BYDDY vs. GWW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BYD Company Limited ADR and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B20222023202420252026
150.23B
4.74B
(BYDDY) Total Revenue
(GWW) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BYDDY values in CNY, GWW values in USD

BYDDY vs. GWW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BYD Company Limited ADR and W.W. Grainger, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
18.8%
40.0%
Portfolio components
BYDDY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a gross profit of 28.25B and revenue of 150.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.8%.

GWW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

BYDDY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported an operating income of 7.18B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

GWW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.

BYDDY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a net income of 4.08B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

GWW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BYDDY and GWW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYDDY has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to GWW (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYDDY dropped -97.38% vs GWW's -56.73%.

GWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYDDY and GWW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer