PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYBU.L vs. S5EE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BYBU.L vs. S5EE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) and UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BYBU.L is traded in USD, while S5EE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the S5EE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYBU.L achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than S5EE.L's 19.95% return.


BYBU.L

1D
0.96%
1M
4.76%
YTD
8.18%
6M
9.93%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*

S5EE.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
10.68%
YTD
19.95%
6M
23.16%
1Y
41.93%
3Y*
24.45%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYBU.L vs. S5EE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BYBU.L
Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD
8.18%17.38%14.97%15.90%-12.83%16.62%
S5EE.L
UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc
19.95%20.10%18.01%28.57%-19.18%24.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BYBU.L and S5EE.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2021

0.49

The correlation between BYBU.L and S5EE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BYBU.L vs. S5EE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BYBU.L
S5EE.L

Financial Services

27.9%
16.0%

Technology

22.4%
48.5%

Consumer Cyclical

15.8%
4.5%

Industrials

9.0%
9.0%

Healthcare

7.5%
11.3%

Energy

5.2%

-

Communication Services

4.6%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.1%

Basic Materials

3.1%
2.3%

Real Estate

3.0%
2.7%

Utilities

0.9%

-

Financial Services

BYBU.L
27.9%
S5EE.L
16.0%

Technology

BYBU.L
22.4%
S5EE.L
48.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BYBU.L
15.8%
S5EE.L
4.5%

Industrials

BYBU.L
9.0%
S5EE.L
9.0%

Healthcare

BYBU.L
7.5%
S5EE.L
11.3%

Energy

BYBU.L
5.2%
S5EE.L

-

Communication Services

BYBU.L
4.6%
S5EE.L
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

BYBU.L
3.7%
S5EE.L
3.1%

Basic Materials

BYBU.L
3.1%
S5EE.L
2.3%

Real Estate

BYBU.L
3.0%
S5EE.L
2.7%

Utilities

BYBU.L
0.9%
S5EE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYBU.L vs. S5EE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYBU.L
BYBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BYBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

S5EE.L
S5EE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
S5EE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYBU.L vs. S5EE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) and UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BYBU.LS5EE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.58

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

3.89

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.04

16.41

-4.37

BYBU.L vs. S5EE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYBU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the S5EE.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYBU.L and S5EE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BYBU.LS5EE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

3.32

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.91

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

1.02

+0.13

Drawdowns

BYBU.L vs. S5EE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYBU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, roughly equal to the maximum S5EE.L drawdown of -27.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYBU.L and S5EE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYBU.LS5EE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-27.69%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-10.73%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-18.29%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.11%

-27.69%

+5.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.05%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-5.74%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.55%

-0.67%

Volatility

BYBU.L vs. S5EE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) is 3.55%, while UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that BYBU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than S5EE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYBU.LS5EE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.84%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

9.68%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

12.56%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

16.15%

+5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.74%

16.00%

+11.74%

BYBU.L vs. S5EE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BYBU.L and S5EE.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BYBU.L vs. S5EE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BYBU.L nor S5EE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BYBU.L and S5EE.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BYBU.L and S5EE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

BYBU.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR, while S5EE.L tracks S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYBU.L and S5EE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer