PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYBU.L vs. SPYL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BYBU.L vs. SPYL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BYBU.L vs. SPYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BYBU.L
Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD
-0.51%17.38%14.97%15.79%
SPYL.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-4.07%17.39%25.33%14.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYBU.L achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly higher than SPYL.L's -4.07% return.


BYBU.L

1D
0.96%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
-0.51%
6M
2.22%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*

SPYL.L

1D
2.47%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
-4.07%
6M
-0.94%
1Y
18.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BYBU.L vs. SPYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BYBU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BYBU.L vs. SPYL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYBU.L
BYBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BYBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYL.L
SPYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYBU.L vs. SPYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BYBU.LSPYL.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

1.14

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

1.65

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

4.12

-2.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.78

18.27

-10.48

BYBU.L vs. SPYL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYBU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYBU.L and SPYL.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BYBU.LSPYL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.14

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.54

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between BYBU.L and SPYL.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BYBU.L vs. SPYL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BYBU.L nor SPYL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BYBU.L vs. SPYL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYBU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than SPYL.L's maximum drawdown of -18.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYBU.L and SPYL.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BYBU.LSPYL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-18.42%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.03%

-11.78%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.80%

-5.41%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-1.83%

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

1.83%

+0.88%

Volatility

BYBU.L vs. SPYL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) is 3.59%, while SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that BYBU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BYBU.LSPYL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

4.84%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

8.65%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.61%

15.92%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.35%

14.03%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.28%

14.03%

+14.25%