PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
S5EE.L vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

S5EE.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

S5EE.L vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
S5EE.L
UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc
-3.50%11.67%20.01%22.12%-9.72%28.03%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
12.30%52.02%28.87%7.06%11.03%8.88%
Different Trading Currencies

S5EE.L is traded in GBp, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S5EE.L achieves a -3.50% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 10.64% return.


S5EE.L

1D
2.18%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
-3.50%
6M
3.09%
1Y
14.44%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*

GLD

1D
0.00%
1M
-10.97%
YTD
10.64%
6M
23.20%
1Y
46.23%
3Y*
29.88%
5Y*
22.68%
10Y*
14.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


S5EE.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

S5EE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

S5EE.L vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S5EE.L
S5EE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
S5EE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S5EE.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


S5EE.LGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

1.79

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

2.24

-0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.34

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.58

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.07

9.79

-3.73

S5EE.L vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S5EE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S5EE.L and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


S5EE.LGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

1.79

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

1.38

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.70

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between S5EE.L and GLD is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

S5EE.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither S5EE.L nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

S5EE.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S5EE.L drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S5EE.L and GLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


S5EE.LGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-45.56%

+25.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-19.21%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.25%

-21.03%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.07%

-11.71%

+5.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-16.17%

+12.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

5.25%

-2.84%

Volatility

S5EE.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) is 4.41%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that S5EE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


S5EE.LGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

10.65%

-6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

23.23%

-14.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

25.89%

-10.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

16.53%

-1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

16.23%

-1.59%