S5EE.L vs. SUAS.L
S5EE.L (UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc) and SUAS.L (iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - S5EE.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD, while SUAS.L is a ESG fund tracking the MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, S5EE.L returned 15.97%/yr vs 12.36%/yr for SUAS.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. S5EE.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SUAS.L.
Performance
S5EE.L vs. SUAS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
S5EE.L is traded in GBp, while SUAS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SUAS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S5EE.L achieves a 20.36% return, which is significantly higher than SUAS.L's 14.07% return.
S5EE.L
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 6M
- 22.25%
- 1Y
- 43.69%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SUAS.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 25.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- —
S5EE.L vs. SUAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S5EE.L UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc | 20.36% | 11.67% | 20.01% | 22.12% | -9.72% | 28.03% |
SUAS.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.07% | 3.04% | 16.06% | 18.15% | -9.01% | 29.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between S5EE.L and SUAS.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between S5EE.L and SUAS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
S5EE.L vs. SUAS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S5EE.L
SUAS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
S5EE.L
SUAS.L
Financial Services
S5EE.L
SUAS.L
Healthcare
S5EE.L
SUAS.L
Industrials
S5EE.L
SUAS.L
Consumer Cyclical
S5EE.L
SUAS.L
Consumer Defensive
S5EE.L
SUAS.L
Real Estate
S5EE.L
SUAS.L
Communication Services
S5EE.L
SUAS.L
Basic Materials
S5EE.L
SUAS.L
Energy
S5EE.L
-
SUAS.L
-
Utilities
S5EE.L
-
SUAS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S5EE.L vs. SUAS.L — Risk / Return Rank
S5EE.L
SUAS.L
S5EE.L vs. SUAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| S5EE.L | SUAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.35 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.05 | 3.57 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.93 | 11.55 | +7.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| S5EE.L | SUAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68 | 1.97 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 0.78 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.97 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
S5EE.L vs. SUAS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S5EE.L drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum SUAS.L drawdown of -25.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S5EE.L and SUAS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S5EE.L | SUAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.25% | -25.25% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -7.13% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.25% | -22.02% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.25% | -22.02% | +1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -3.83% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.21% | +0.09% |
Volatility
S5EE.L vs. SUAS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) is 3.83%, while iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUAS.L) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that S5EE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S5EE.L | SUAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 4.61% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.78% | 9.99% | -1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 13.01% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 15.92% | -1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 17.70% | -3.07% |
S5EE.L vs. SUAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S5EE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SUAS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
S5EE.L vs. SUAS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither S5EE.L nor SUAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
S5EE.L and SUAS.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S5EE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S5EE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUAS.L.
S5EE.L is categorized as S&P 500, while SUAS.L is ESG. S5EE.L tracks S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD, while SUAS.L tracks MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for S5EE.L and 0.20% for SUAS.L.
Find the right allocation for S5EE.L and SUAS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer