BYBU.L vs. IMSU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L).
BYBU.L and IMSU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BYBU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Buyback NTR. It was launched on Jan 31, 2018. IMSU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. Both BYBU.L and IMSU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BYBU.L vs. IMSU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BYBU.L vs. IMSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYBU.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | -0.51% | 17.38% | 14.97% | 15.90% | -12.83% | 37.69% | 3.27% | 31.62% | -6.60% | 8.16% |
IMSU.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.18% | 11.17% | -0.99% | 11.87% | -11.90% | 27.47% | 19.90% | 23.86% | -15.88% | 11.30% |
Different Trading Currencies
BYBU.L is traded in USD, while IMSU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IMSU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYBU.L achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly lower than IMSU.L's 10.18% return.
BYBU.L
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
IMSU.L
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 12.84%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BYBU.L vs. IMSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BYBU.L and IMSU.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BYBU.L vs. IMSU.L — Risk / Return Rank
BYBU.L
IMSU.L
BYBU.L vs. IMSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BYBU.L | IMSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 1.01 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.43 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.53 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | 4.74 | +3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BYBU.L | IMSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.01 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.36 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.48 | +0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between BYBU.L and IMSU.L is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BYBU.L vs. IMSU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BYBU.L nor IMSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BYBU.L vs. IMSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYBU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, smaller than the maximum IMSU.L drawdown of -35.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYBU.L and IMSU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYBU.L | IMSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.64% | -28.25% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.03% | -12.29% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.11% | -21.70% | -0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -4.40% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -5.58% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 2.98% | -0.27% |
Volatility
BYBU.L vs. IMSU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) is 3.59%, while iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that BYBU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BYBU.L | IMSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 6.40% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 12.04% | -3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.61% | 18.44% | -1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 18.59% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.28% | 19.98% | +8.30% |