BXSL vs. MDLZ
BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending Fund) and MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) are both stocks. BXSL operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while MDLZ operates in Confectioners (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, BXSL returned 7.49%/yr vs -1.98%/yr for MDLZ. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BXSL vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BXSL achieves a -6.39% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's 18.03% return.
BXSL
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -9.95%
- 1Y
- -15.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDLZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- -2.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
BXSL vs. MDLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | -6.39% | -9.36% | 29.02% | 37.82% | -26.03% | 32.04% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 18.03% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 10.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BXSL and MDLZ is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.14 |
The correlation between BXSL and MDLZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BXSL:
$1.80
MDLZ:
$2.68
BXSL:
13.26
MDLZ:
23.51
BXSL:
7.76
MDLZ:
1.56
BXSL:
$706.98M
MDLZ:
$39.30B
BXSL:
$831.73M
MDLZ:
$11.31B
BXSL:
$525.53M
MDLZ:
$4.67B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BXSL vs. MDLZ — Risk / Return Rank
BXSL
MDLZ
BXSL vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BXSL | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.98 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -0.17 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | -0.30 | -0.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BXSL vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BXSL drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, smaller than the maximum MDLZ drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXSL and MDLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BXSL | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.80% | -42.52% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.47% | -25.93% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.21% | -29.00% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.54% | -12.59% | -7.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.15% | -11.03% | -3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.73% | 14.70% | +1.03% |
Volatility
BXSL vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) have volatilities of 5.42% and 5.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BXSL | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 5.46% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | 16.28% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 22.26% | -2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 19.52% | +4.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 21.03% | +2.82% |
Dividends
BXSL vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison
BXSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.91%, more than MDLZ's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 12.91% | 11.70% | 9.53% | 10.64% | 13.02% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.13% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
Financials
BXSL vs. MDLZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and Mondelez International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BXSL and MDLZ have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDLZ has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to BXSL (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXSL dropped -36.80% vs MDLZ's -42.52%.
MDLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BXSL and MDLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer