BWOW vs. EZET
BWOW (Bitwise Dogecoin ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BWOW tracks the DOGE/USD Exchange Rate - Benchmark Price Return while EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BWOW charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.
Performance
BWOW vs. EZET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWOW achieves a -21.75% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -39.43% return.
BWOW
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- -16.98%
- YTD
- -21.75%
- 6M
- -39.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZET
- 1D
- -5.67%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.43%
- 6M
- -42.74%
- 1Y
- -31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BWOW vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BWOW Bitwise Dogecoin ETF | -21.75% | -24.63% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -39.43% | -1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWOW and EZET is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWOW vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank
BWOW
EZET
BWOW vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BWOW | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.87 | -0.41 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
BWOW vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWOW drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -64.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWOW and EZET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWOW | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.77% | -64.05% | +21.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -62.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.02% | -62.87% | +21.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -32.67% | +3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 37.73% | — |
Volatility
BWOW vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWOW | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.31% | 68.43% | +5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.31% | 72.37% | +1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.31% | 72.37% | +1.94% |
BWOW vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison
BWOW has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BWOW vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison
Neither BWOW nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BWOW and EZET have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BWOW.
BWOW and EZET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BWOW tracks DOGE/USD Exchange Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BWOW and 0.19% for EZET.
Find the right allocation for BWOW and EZET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer