PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWOW vs. CLNK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BWOW vs. CLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW) and Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BWOW

1D
-2.45%
1M
-16.98%
YTD
-21.75%
6M
-39.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLNK

1D
-4.18%
1M
-12.86%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWOW vs. CLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
BWOW
Bitwise Dogecoin ETF
-37.82%
CLNK
Bitwise Chainlink ETF
-41.92%

Correlation

The correlation between BWOW and CLNK is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWOW vs. CLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW) and Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BWOW vs. CLNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWOWCLNKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.87

-1.14

+0.26

Drawdowns

BWOW vs. CLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWOW drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, roughly equal to the maximum CLNK drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWOW and CLNK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWOWCLNKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.77%

-43.56%

+0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.02%

-41.92%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.82%

-32.34%

+3.52%

Volatility

BWOW vs. CLNK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWOWCLNKDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.31%

67.16%

+7.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.31%

67.16%

+7.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.31%

67.16%

+7.15%

BWOW vs. CLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BWOW and CLNK have an expense ratio of 0.34%.


Dividends

BWOW vs. CLNK - Dividend Comparison

Neither BWOW nor CLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BWOW and CLNK have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.34% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BWOW and CLNK have the same expense ratio: 0.34% per year.

BWOW and CLNK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BWOW tracks DOGE/USD Exchange Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while CLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK) spot price.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWOW and CLNK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer