BWOW vs. ETHW
BWOW (Bitwise Dogecoin ETF) and ETHW (Bitwise Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Bitwise. BWOW is passively managed, while ETHW is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BWOW charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHW.
Performance
BWOW vs. ETHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWOW achieves a -33.12% return, which is significantly higher than ETHW's -44.19% return.
BWOW
- 1D
- -5.22%
- 1M
- -24.37%
- YTD
- -33.12%
- 6M
- -39.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHW
- 1D
- -4.27%
- 1M
- -19.58%
- YTD
- -44.19%
- 6M
- -44.14%
- 1Y
- -28.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BWOW vs. ETHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BWOW Bitwise Dogecoin ETF | -33.12% | -22.26% |
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | -44.19% | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWOW and ETHW is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWOW vs. ETHW — Risk / Return Rank
BWOW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETHW
BWOW vs. ETHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW) and Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BWOW | ETHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.98 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BWOW vs. ETHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWOW drawdown since its inception was -49.59%, smaller than the maximum ETHW drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWOW and ETHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWOW | ETHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.59% | -67.57% | +17.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -67.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.59% | -65.78% | +16.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.13% | -33.64% | +3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 40.41% | — |
Volatility
BWOW vs. ETHW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWOW | ETHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 47.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.06% | 69.07% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.06% | 72.28% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.06% | 72.28% | +0.78% |
BWOW vs. ETHW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BWOW has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHW's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BWOW vs. ETHW - Dividend Comparison
Neither BWOW nor ETHW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BWOW and ETHW have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BWOW.
BWOW and ETHW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BWOW and 0.20% for ETHW.
Find the right allocation for BWOW and ETHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer