PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BVAOX vs. FDSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BVAOX vs. FDSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Small Cap Fund (BVAOX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVAOX achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than FDSCX's 16.09% return. Over the past 10 years, BVAOX has underperformed FDSCX with an annualized return of -2.54%, while FDSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


BVAOX

1D
-0.68%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
7.01%
6M
7.11%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
-2.54%

FDSCX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
16.09%
6M
14.16%
1Y
39.37%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVAOX vs. FDSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BVAOX
Madison Small Cap Fund
7.01%-7.16%21.83%16.06%-24.38%20.38%23.06%-49.49%-12.21%-2.21%
FDSCX
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund
16.09%14.33%14.51%19.46%-18.28%24.76%21.76%30.42%-8.90%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BVAOX and FDSCX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.91

The correlation between BVAOX and FDSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BVAOX vs. FDSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BVAOX
BVAOX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BVAOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BVAOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BVAOX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BVAOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BVAOX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

FDSCX
FDSCX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FDSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVAOX vs. FDSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Small Cap Fund (BVAOX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BVAOXFDSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.38

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

3.91

-3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

15.22

-13.64

BVAOX vs. FDSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BVAOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the FDSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BVAOX and FDSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BVAOXFDSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

2.21

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.46

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

0.59

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.42

-0.17

Drawdowns

BVAOX vs. FDSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVAOX drawdown since its inception was -75.76%, which is greater than FDSCX's maximum drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAOX and FDSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BVAOXFDSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.76%

-65.47%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-10.04%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-27.42%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.32%

-30.56%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.76%

-38.43%

-37.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.85%

-1.62%

-36.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.81%

-11.22%

-9.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

2.57%

+1.89%

Volatility

BVAOX vs. FDSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Small Cap Fund (BVAOX) is 4.59%, while Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that BVAOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BVAOXFDSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

5.17%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

13.32%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

17.85%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.44%

21.63%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.25%

21.87%

+6.38%

BVAOX vs. FDSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVAOX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FDSCX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

BVAOX vs. FDSCX - Dividend Comparison

BVAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.40%, more than FDSCX's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BVAOX
Madison Small Cap Fund
9.40%10.06%9.63%0.29%5.51%28.31%6.63%19.91%25.09%0.00%4.73%9.18%
FDSCX
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund
0.62%0.72%2.71%0.23%0.12%10.85%1.40%2.13%22.39%10.02%1.63%7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


BVAOX and FDSCX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDSCX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to BVAOX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVAOX dropped -75.76% vs FDSCX's -65.47%.

FDSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BVAOX and FDSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer