BVAL vs. SPYV
BVAL (Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Bluemonte, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BVAL charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
BVAL vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BVAL achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.46% return.
BVAL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- 11.47%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
BVAL vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF | 11.47% | 11.38% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.46% | 11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BVAL and SPYV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.96 |
BVAL vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BVAL
SPYV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BVAL
SPYV
Financial Services
BVAL
SPYV
Industrials
BVAL
SPYV
Healthcare
BVAL
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
BVAL
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
BVAL
SPYV
Energy
BVAL
SPYV
Communication Services
BVAL
SPYV
Utilities
BVAL
SPYV
Real Estate
BVAL
SPYV
Basic Materials
BVAL
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BVAL vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
BVAL
SPYV
BVAL vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BVAL | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.55 | 0.42 | +2.12 |
Drawdowns
BVAL vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BVAL | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -58.45% | +51.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.57% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -8.72% | +7.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility
BVAL vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BVAL | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 9.84% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.13% | 14.40% | -4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.13% | 16.94% | -6.81% |
BVAL vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BVAL vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SPYV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF | 0.97% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, BVAL and SPYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BVAL.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.97% for BVAL.
BVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.04% for SPYV.
Find the right allocation for BVAL and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer