BVAL vs. ABEQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BVAL (Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF) and ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BVAL charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ABEQ.

Performance

BVAL vs. ABEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVAL achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than ABEQ's 3.44% return.

BVAL

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 4.10%
• YTD: 11.47%
• 6M: 11.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABEQ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: 3.44%
• 6M: 3.43%
• 1Y: 8.87%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVAL vs. ABEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	11.47%	11.38%
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	3.44%	5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BVAL and ABEQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.69

BVAL vs. ABEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BVAL	ABEQ
Technology	20.1%	4.4%
Financial Services	16.9%	24.8%
Industrials	11.8%	8.3%
Healthcare	11.1%	7.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.2%	10.9%
Energy	6.8%	10.3%
Communication Services	5.2%	3.0%
Utilities	4.3%	1.4%
Real Estate	3.5%	-
Basic Materials	3.1%	17.0%

Return for Risk

BVAL vs. ABEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEQ

ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 25
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVAL vs. ABEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BVAL	ABEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.55	0.56	+1.99

Drawdowns

BVAL vs. ABEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, smaller than the maximum ABEQ drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and ABEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BVAL	ABEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-27.82%	+21.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-7.43%	+7.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.91%	-4.07%	+3.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BVAL	ABEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.98%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.13%	8.91%	+1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.13%	10.81%	-0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.13%	13.84%	-3.71%

BVAL vs. ABEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than ABEQ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BVAL vs. ABEQ - Dividend Comparison

BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than ABEQ's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	1.21%	1.25%	1.48%	2.60%	1.20%	0.60%	0.60%
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	0.97%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BVAL and ABEQ in my portfolio?

BVAL and ABEQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BVAL or ABEQ?

On fees, BVAL is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BVAL or ABEQ?

BVAL is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BVAL or ABEQ?

ABEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.97% for BVAL.

What is the main difference between BVAL and ABEQ?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Absolute Investment Advisers LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.85% for ABEQ.