PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUZZ vs. NLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUZZ vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 22.01% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's 6.14% return.


BUZZ

1D
-2.53%
1M
14.04%
YTD
22.01%
6M
16.69%
1Y
44.51%
3Y*
36.58%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*

NLR

1D
-4.59%
1M
-8.11%
YTD
6.14%
6M
1.51%
1Y
36.84%
3Y*
35.11%
5Y*
21.94%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUZZ vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
22.01%30.61%33.74%54.64%-47.67%-0.89%
NLR
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
6.14%56.50%14.26%36.67%2.29%16.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and NLR is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021

0.55

The correlation between BUZZ and NLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUZZ vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUZZ
NLR

Technology

49.0%
1.5%

Communication Services

12.9%

-

Financial Services

12.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%

-

Industrials

5.2%
15.1%

Healthcare

4.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.4%

-

Utilities

0.9%
37.4%

Energy

0.6%
46.0%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

BUZZ
49.0%
NLR
1.5%

Communication Services

BUZZ
12.9%
NLR

-

Financial Services

BUZZ
12.8%
NLR

-

Consumer Cyclical

BUZZ
11.9%
NLR

-

Industrials

BUZZ
5.2%
NLR
15.1%

Healthcare

BUZZ
4.9%
NLR

-

Consumer Defensive

BUZZ
1.4%
NLR

-

Utilities

BUZZ
0.9%
NLR
37.4%

Energy

BUZZ
0.6%
NLR
46.0%

Basic Materials

BUZZ
0.3%
NLR

-

Real Estate

BUZZ

-

NLR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUZZ
BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUZZ vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUZZNLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

0.88

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

1.43

+0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.17

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.43

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.56

2.93

+0.63

BUZZ vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUZZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUZZ and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUZZNLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

0.88

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.75

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.18

+0.15

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and NLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUZZNLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.87%

-65.05%

+8.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.47%

-25.80%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-30.48%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.87%

-30.48%

-26.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-19.80%

+16.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-35.72%

+11.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.55%

12.61%

-0.06%

Volatility

BUZZ vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) is 9.36%, while VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that BUZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUZZNLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.36%

13.18%

-3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.67%

32.83%

-9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.35%

42.32%

-10.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.98%

29.24%

+3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.69%

24.02%

+8.67%

BUZZ vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUZZ vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

BUZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.52%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NLR
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
2.40%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUZZ and NLR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLR has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to BUZZ (9.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs NLR's -65.05%.

On 5-year performance, NLR leads with 21.94% vs 9.80% for BUZZ. On fees, NLR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BUZZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NLR has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NLR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BUZZ.

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.00% for BUZZ.

BUZZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. BUZZ tracks BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, while NLR tracks DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BUZZ and 0.60% for NLR.

BUZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUZZ and NLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer