BUZZ vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BUZZ (VanEck Social Sentiment ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUZZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. BUZZ is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, BUZZ returned 13.00% vs 266.72% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.62, they often move in opposite directions. BUZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

BUZZ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -31.90% return.

BUZZ

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -3.37%
• 6M: 1.25%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 1Y: 13.00%
• 3Y*: 27.57%
• 5Y*: 7.66%
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -11.25%
• 1M: 29.92%
• 6M: -7.52%
• YTD: -31.90%
• 1Y: 266.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUZZ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	9.39%	30.61%	19.71%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-31.90%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and MSTZ is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.62

The correlation between BUZZ and MSTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.65 to -0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUZZ

BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 16
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 16
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 15

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 65
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUZZ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUZZ	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	1.81	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	2.41	-1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.31	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.43	3.16	-2.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.00	6.14	-5.14

BUZZ vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUZZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUZZ and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUZZ	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.87%	-99.38%	+42.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.47%	-84.89%	+54.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.89%	-97.68%	+84.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.71%	-94.54%	+70.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.00%	43.66%	-30.66%

Volatility

BUZZ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) is 8.73%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 57.19%. This indicates that BUZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUZZ	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.73%	57.19%	-48.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.01%	135.18%	-110.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.16%	148.74%	-115.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.36%	171.04%	-137.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.85%	171.04%	-138.19%

BUZZ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUZZ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUZZ nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.52%	0.40%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUZZ and MSTZ in my portfolio?

BUZZ and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUZZ or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (57.19%) compared to BUZZ (8.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, BUZZ or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 266.72% vs 13.00% for BUZZ. On fees, BUZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BUZZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUZZ or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 266.72% return vs 13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUZZ or MSTZ?

BUZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUZZ or MSTZ?

BUZZ and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUZZ and MSTZ?

BUZZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BUZZ and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.