BUZZ vs. GDXJ
BUZZ (VanEck Social Sentiment ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUZZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, while GDXJ is a Materials fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUZZ returned 9.80%/yr vs 17.46%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for GDXJ.
Performance
BUZZ vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 22.01% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -2.55% return.
BUZZ
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- 14.04%
- YTD
- 22.01%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- 1Y
- 44.51%
- 3Y*
- 36.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- —
GDXJ
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 65.12%
- 3Y*
- 46.12%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
BUZZ vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF | 22.01% | 30.61% | 33.74% | 54.64% | -47.67% | -0.89% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | -2.55% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -5.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUZZ and GDXJ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021 | 0.29 |
BUZZ vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUZZ
GDXJ
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
BUZZ
GDXJ
-
Communication Services
BUZZ
GDXJ
-
Financial Services
BUZZ
GDXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUZZ
GDXJ
-
Industrials
BUZZ
GDXJ
-
Healthcare
BUZZ
GDXJ
-
Consumer Defensive
BUZZ
GDXJ
-
Utilities
BUZZ
GDXJ
-
Energy
BUZZ
GDXJ
-
Basic Materials
BUZZ
GDXJ
Real Estate
BUZZ
-
GDXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUZZ vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
BUZZ
GDXJ
BUZZ vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUZZ | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.93 | 1.74 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.99 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 4.95 | -1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUZZ | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.43 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.06 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
BUZZ vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and GDXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUZZ | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.87% | -88.66% | +31.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.47% | -32.92% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | -32.92% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.87% | -50.99% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -29.01% | +26.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -60.50% | +36.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.55% | 13.19% | -0.64% |
Volatility
BUZZ vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) is 9.36%, while VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 16.66%. This indicates that BUZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUZZ | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 16.66% | -7.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.67% | 41.34% | -17.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.35% | 49.79% | -18.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 41.10% | -8.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 44.06% | -11.37% |
BUZZ vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUZZ vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
BUZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.39% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUZZ and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (16.66%) compared to BUZZ (9.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.
On 5-year performance, GDXJ leads with 17.46% vs 9.80% for BUZZ. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, BUZZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BUZZ.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.00% for BUZZ.
BUZZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GDXJ is Materials. BUZZ tracks BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BUZZ and 0.54% for GDXJ.
BUZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUZZ and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer