BUZZ vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

BUZZ (VanEck Social Sentiment ETF) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - BUZZ tracks the BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index while FNGS tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUZZ returned 7.60%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for FNGS. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

BUZZ vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 6.79% return.

BUZZ

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: 13.20%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 31.99%
• 3Y*: 31.61%
• 5Y*: 7.60%
• 10Y*: —

FNGS

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 29.80%
• 5Y*: 19.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUZZ vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	13.20%	30.61%	33.74%	54.64%	-47.67%	-4.47%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	6.79%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and FNGS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021	0.78

The correlation between BUZZ and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUZZ vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUZZ	FNGS
Technology	42.7%	59.9%
Communication Services	14.6%	28.8%
Consumer Cyclical	14.5%	11.3%
Financial Services	13.9%	10.0%
Healthcare	4.9%	-
Industrials	3.8%	-
Energy	2.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	-
Utilities	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	0.7%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUZZ

BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 27
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 29
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 23

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUZZ vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUZZ	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.79	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	1.19	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.15	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.05	0.75	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.54	2.12	+0.42

BUZZ vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUZZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUZZ and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUZZ	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.87%	-48.98%	-7.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.47%	-22.93%	-7.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.47%	-26.77%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.87%	-48.98%	-7.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.85%	-9.63%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.91%	-10.85%	-13.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.65%	8.05%	+4.60%

Volatility

BUZZ vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) has a higher volatility of 12.00% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.74%. This indicates that BUZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUZZ	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.00%	8.74%	+3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.17%	17.19%	+7.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.59%	21.65%	+10.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.19%	30.10%	+3.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.88%	31.17%	+1.71%

BUZZ vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUZZ vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUZZ nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.52%	0.40%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUZZ and FNGS in my portfolio?

BUZZ and FNGS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUZZ or FNGS?

BUZZ has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to FNGS (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, BUZZ or FNGS?

On 5-year performance, FNGS leads with 19.76% vs 7.60% for BUZZ. On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUZZ or FNGS?

Over the 5-year period, FNGS has performed better with a 19.76% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUZZ or FNGS?

FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BUZZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUZZ or FNGS?

BUZZ and FNGS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUZZ and FNGS?

BUZZ tracks BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BUZZ and 0.58% for FNGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.