BUZZ vs. FITZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BUZZ (VanEck Social Sentiment ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BUZZ is passively managed, while FITZ is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

BUZZ vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BUZZ

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 12.16%
• YTD: 22.04%
• 6M: 13.06%
• 1Y: 43.81%
• 3Y*: 36.50%
• 5Y*: 9.81%
• 10Y*: —

FITZ

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUZZ vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	-0.97%
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	-1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and FITZ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.60

Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. FITZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUZZ

BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 34
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUZZ vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUZZ	FITZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.50	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUZZ	FITZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	-7.29	+7.62

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and FITZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUZZ	FITZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.87%	-1.97%	-54.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.82%	-1.97%	-0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.98%	-1.08%	-22.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUZZ	FITZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.31%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.33%	8.74%	+22.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.97%	8.74%	+24.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.68%	8.74%	+23.94%

BUZZ vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BUZZ and FITZ have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

BUZZ vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUZZ nor FITZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.52%	0.40%
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUZZ and FITZ in my portfolio?

BUZZ and FITZ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BUZZ or FITZ?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUZZ or FITZ?

BUZZ and FITZ have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUZZ or FITZ?

BUZZ and FITZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUZZ and FITZ?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Nicholas.