BURL vs. BOOT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT).

Performance

BURL vs. BOOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BURL vs. BOOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BURL Burlington Stores, Inc.	12.65%	1.33%	46.58%	-4.08%	-30.44%	11.45%	14.70%	40.18%	32.22%	45.17%
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.	-17.06%	16.24%	97.79%	22.78%	-49.19%	183.79%	-2.63%	161.48%	2.53%	32.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BURL : $20.87B BOOT : $4.50B
EPS BURL : $9.53 BOOT : $7.12
PE Ratio BURL : 34.14 BOOT : 20.55
PEG Ratio BURL : 1.76 BOOT : 0.39
PS Ratio BURL : 1.80 BOOT : 2.07
PB Ratio BURL : 5.36 BOOT : 3.50
Total Revenue (TTM) BURL : $11.56B BOOT : $2.17B
Gross Profit (TTM) BURL : $5.08B BOOT : $831.18M
EBITDA (TTM) BURL : $1.30B BOOT : $347.67M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BURL achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than BOOT's -17.06% return. Over the past 10 years, BURL has underperformed BOOT with an annualized return of 19.14%, while BOOT has yielded a comparatively higher 31.25% annualized return.

BURL

• 1D: 4.12%
• 1M: 6.03%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 6M: 27.85%
• 1Y: 36.52%
• 3Y*: 17.20%
• 5Y*: 1.69%
• 10Y*: 19.14%

BOOT

• 1D: 4.59%
• 1M: -22.65%
• YTD: -17.06%
• 6M: -11.68%
• 1Y: 36.24%
• 3Y*: 24.07%
• 5Y*: 18.82%
• 10Y*: 31.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BURL vs. BOOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BURL

BURL Risk / Return Rank: 71
BURL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BURL Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BURL Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BURL Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
BURL Martin Ratio Rank: 74

BOOT

BOOT Risk / Return Rank: 67
BOOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BOOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BOOT Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BOOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BOOT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BURL vs. BOOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BURL	BOOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	0.72	+0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	1.38	+0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.16	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	1.24	+0.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.26	4.03	+0.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BURL vs. BOOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BURL Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the BOOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BURL and BOOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BURL	BOOT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	0.72	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.38	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.54	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.33	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between BURL and BOOT is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BURL vs. BOOT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BURL nor BOOT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BURL vs. BOOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BURL drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, smaller than the maximum BOOT drawdown of -83.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BURL and BOOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BURL	BOOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.87%	-83.73%	+14.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.55%	-32.71%	+13.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.87%	-60.62%	-8.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.87%	-77.88%	+9.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.73%	-29.63%	+21.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.69%	-32.48%	+13.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.67%	10.05%	-1.38%

Volatility

BURL vs. BOOT - Volatility Comparison

Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) has a higher volatility of 12.94% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) at 12.00%. This indicates that BURL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BURL	BOOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.94%	12.00%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.80%	29.98%	-1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.95%	50.59%	-9.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.64%	49.75%	-6.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.63%	57.78%	-16.15%

Financials

BURL vs. BOOT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BURL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Burlington Stores, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 3.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.

BOOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 281.24M and revenue of 705.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.

BURL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Burlington Stores, Inc. reported an operating income of 417.86M and revenue of 3.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

BOOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.78M and revenue of 705.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

BURL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Burlington Stores, Inc. reported a net income of 310.39M and revenue of 3.65B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.

BOOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 85.81M and revenue of 705.64M, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.