BUR vs. FN
BUR (Burford Capital Ltd) and FN (Fabrinet) are both stocks. BUR operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BUR returned -1.59%/yr vs 28.66%/yr for FN. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BUR vs. FN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUR achieves a -53.19% return, which is significantly lower than FN's -4.36% return. Over the past 10 years, BUR has underperformed FN with an annualized return of -1.59%, while FN has yielded a comparatively higher 28.66% annualized return.
BUR
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- 6M
- -56.91%
- YTD
- -53.19%
- 1Y
- -66.18%
- 3Y*
- -32.44%
- 5Y*
- -16.46%
- 10Y*
- -1.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.58%
FN
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -12.85%
- 6M
- -11.04%
- YTD
- -4.36%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 52.15%
- 5Y*
- 35.73%
- 10Y*
- 28.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 25.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.51M | $8.05M | $11.43M | |
FN Fabrinet | $369.31M | $374.33M | $584.37M |
BUR vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUR Burford Capital Ltd | -53.19% | -29.24% | -17.52% | 93.24% | -21.63% | 10.98% | 3.09% | -52.91% | 35.14% | 128.53% |
FN Fabrinet | -4.36% | 107.06% | 15.53% | 48.44% | 8.23% | 52.69% | 19.66% | 26.37% | 78.78% | -28.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUR and FN is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015 | 0.17 |
The correlation between BUR and FN shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BUR:
$902.55M
FN:
$15.60B
BUR:
$0.39
FN:
$11.64
BUR:
10.51
FN:
37.40
BUR:
0.03
FN:
1.60
BUR:
2.43
FN:
3.72
BUR:
$371.23M
FN:
$4.24B
BUR:
$262.56M
FN:
$509.75M
BUR:
$153.92M
FN:
$422.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUR vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank
BUR
FN
BUR vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burford Capital Ltd (BUR) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUR | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.14 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 0.78 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 2.36 | -3.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUR vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUR drawdown since its inception was -86.92%, which is greater than FN's maximum drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUR and FN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUR | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.92% | -70.46% | -16.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.45% | -44.47% | -26.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.30% | -44.47% | -30.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.30% | -44.47% | -30.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.92% | -51.11% | -35.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.40% | -41.67% | -41.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.26% | -22.65% | -17.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.14% | 14.68% | +31.46% |
Volatility
BUR vs. FN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Burford Capital Ltd (BUR) is 10.28%, while Fabrinet (FN) has a volatility of 20.97%. This indicates that BUR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUR | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.28% | 20.97% | -10.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.33% | 58.26% | +17.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.85% | 71.07% | -4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.15% | 54.89% | -3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.25% | 48.81% | +9.44% |
Dividends
BUR vs. FN - Dividend Comparison
BUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, while FN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUR Burford Capital Ltd | 3.03% | 1.40% | 0.98% | 0.80% | 1.53% | 1.78% |
FN Fabrinet | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BUR vs. FN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Burford Capital Ltd and Fabrinet. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BUR vs. FN - Profitability Comparison
BUR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Burford Capital Ltd reported a gross profit of 58.59M and revenue of 69.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.9%.
FN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
BUR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Burford Capital Ltd reported an operating income of 24.79M and revenue of 69.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.5%.
FN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
BUR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Burford Capital Ltd reported a net income of -20.27M and revenue of 69.80M, resulting in a net margin of -29.0%.
FN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BUR and FN have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FN has higher volatility (20.97%) compared to BUR (10.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUR dropped -86.92% vs FN's -70.46%.
FN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUR and FN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer