BULZ vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BULZ (MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BULZ is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BULZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

BULZ vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a 25.41% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.

BULZ

• 1D: 10.00%
• 1M: -9.61%
• 6M: 24.24%
• YTD: 25.41%
• 1Y: 91.64%
• 3Y*: 62.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.31%

LINT

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -46.62%
• 6M: 135.02%
• YTD: 266.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BULZ MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs	$25.71M	$28.40M	$43.12M
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.84M	$20.02M	$35.16M

BULZ vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BULZ MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs	25.41%	9.75%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	266.23%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BULZ and LINT is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.66

BULZ vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BULZ	LINT
Technology	65.0%	100.0%
Communication Services	20.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	14.2%	-
Financial Services	13.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BULZ vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 43
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 36

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BULZ vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BULZ	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.75	—	—

Drawdowns

BULZ vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BULZ	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.44%	-69.02%	-25.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.91%	-62.23%	+21.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.56%	-24.07%	-33.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BULZ	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.17%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	85.84%	169.02%	-83.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.15%	169.02%	-76.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.15%	169.02%	-76.87%

BULZ vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BULZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

BULZ vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.

Position	TTM	2025
BULZ MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.74%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BULZ and LINT in my portfolio?

BULZ and LINT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BULZ or LINT?

On fees, BULZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BULZ or LINT?

BULZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BULZ or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.

What is the main difference between BULZ and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BULZ and 0.97% for LINT.