BULP.L vs. LHKG.DE
BULP.L (WisdomTree Gold) and LHKG.DE (Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - BULP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while LHKG.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BULP.L returned 12.01%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for LHKG.DE. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BULP.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LHKG.DE.
Performance
BULP.L vs. LHKG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BULP.L is traded in GBp, while LHKG.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LHKG.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULP.L achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than LHKG.DE's -7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, BULP.L has outperformed LHKG.DE with an annualized return of 12.01%, while LHKG.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 3.54% annualized return.
BULP.L
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 31.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.79%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
LHKG.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- -7.11%
- 6M
- -8.85%
- 1Y
- 6.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.32%
- 5Y*
- -2.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.54%
BULP.L vs. LHKG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULP.L WisdomTree Gold | 3.12% | 50.05% | 26.15% | 5.12% | 9.83% | -4.73% | 15.76% | 12.89% | 2.70% | 0.05% |
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | -7.11% | 27.82% | 15.13% | -19.14% | -2.85% | -13.18% | -5.34% | 10.30% | -7.45% | 27.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BULP.L and LHKG.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2007 | 0.06 |
Over the past year, BULP.L and LHKG.DE have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BULP.L vs. LHKG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BULP.L
LHKG.DE
BULP.L vs. LHKG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) and Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BULP.L | LHKG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.07 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 0.35 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.57 | 0.68 | +3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BULP.L | LHKG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.32 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | -0.08 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.16 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.18 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
BULP.L vs. LHKG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.90%, smaller than the maximum LHKG.DE drawdown of -50.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULP.L and LHKG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULP.L | LHKG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.90% | -50.29% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.88% | -18.15% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.88% | -26.43% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.88% | -43.24% | +25.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.68% | -45.85% | +22.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.32% | -16.43% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.25% | -15.18% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.79% | 9.29% | -2.50% |
Volatility
BULP.L vs. LHKG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) is 5.11%, while Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that BULP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LHKG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BULP.L | LHKG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 8.04% | -2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.04% | 13.93% | +6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.59% | 19.50% | +4.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 24.81% | -8.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 22.48% | -6.25% |
BULP.L vs. LHKG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULP.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than LHKG.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BULP.L vs. LHKG.DE - Dividend Comparison
BULP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LHKG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULP.L WisdomTree Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | 1.61% | 1.50% | 2.18% | 0.17% | 3.78% | 1.35% | 2.46% | 2.58% | 3.04% | 2.30% | 3.38% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BULP.L and LHKG.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BULP.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BULP.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LHKG.DE.
BULP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while LHKG.DE is China Equities. BULP.L tracks Gold, while LHKG.DE tracks MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BULP.L and 0.65% for LHKG.DE.
Find the right allocation for BULP.L and LHKG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer