BULD vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BULD (Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - BULD tracks the BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BULD returned 18.81%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for KROP. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BULD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

BULD vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 34.89% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.59% return.

BULD

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 11.06%
• YTD: 34.89%
• 6M: 30.07%
• 1Y: 64.47%
• 3Y*: 18.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 0.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BULD vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF	34.89%	23.20%	-3.93%	28.27%	-12.41%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.59%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-20.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BULD and KROP is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2022	0.51

The correlation between BULD and KROP shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BULD vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BULD

BULD Risk / Return Rank: 72
BULD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
BULD Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BULD Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BULD Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BULD Martin Ratio Rank: 72

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 23
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BULD vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BULD	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	0.81	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	1.24	+1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.15	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	1.14	+3.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.24	2.58	+10.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BULD vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BULD Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BULD and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BULD	KROP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	0.81	+1.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	-0.57	+1.13

Drawdowns

BULD vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BULD	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.64%	-61.96%	+34.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.48%	-11.29%	-4.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.64%	-28.70%	+1.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-48.93%	+48.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.29%	-44.50%	+36.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.88%	4.99%	-0.11%

Volatility

BULD vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.69%. This indicates that BULD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BULD	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.08%	4.69%	+3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.29%	11.98%	+9.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.83%	16.04%	+11.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.72%	22.27%	+5.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.72%	22.27%	+5.45%

BULD vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BULD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BULD vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than KROP's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF	0.92%	1.24%	0.18%	0.21%	0.08%	0.00%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.34%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BULD and KROP in my portfolio?

BULD and KROP have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BULD or KROP?

BULD has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to KROP (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULD dropped -27.64% vs KROP's -61.96%.

Which ETF is better, BULD or KROP?

On 3-year performance, BULD leads with 18.81% vs 0.72% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BULD or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, BULD has performed better with a 18.81% return vs 0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BULD or KROP?

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BULD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BULD or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.92% for BULD.

What is the main difference between BULD and KROP?

BULD tracks BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BULD and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BULD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.