BULD vs. IDGT
BULD (Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF) and IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - BULD tracks the BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index while IDGT tracks the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BULD returned 18.64%/yr vs 25.08%/yr for IDGT. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BULD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for IDGT.
Performance
BULD vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 34.29% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 53.90% return.
BULD
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 14.07%
- YTD
- 34.29%
- 6M
- 30.65%
- 1Y
- 64.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDGT
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 8.43%
- YTD
- 53.90%
- 6M
- 49.82%
- 1Y
- 63.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
BULD vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 34.29% | 23.20% | -3.93% | 28.27% | -12.41% |
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 53.90% | 6.79% | 26.71% | -6.09% | 6.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BULD and IDGT is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2022 | 0.70 |
The correlation between BULD and IDGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BULD vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank
BULD
IDGT
BULD vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BULD | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.52 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 7.54 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.30 | 22.58 | -9.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BULD | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 3.13 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.18 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
BULD vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and IDGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULD | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.64% | -77.95% | +50.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -8.45% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.64% | -23.74% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -1.58% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -19.91% | +11.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 2.81% | +2.07% |
Volatility
BULD vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 7.87%. This indicates that BULD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BULD | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 7.87% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.34% | 16.35% | +4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.85% | 20.41% | +7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 23.20% | +4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 23.29% | +4.44% |
BULD vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
BULD vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison
BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than IDGT's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 0.92% | 1.24% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.64% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.60% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BULD and IDGT have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BULD has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to IDGT (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULD dropped -27.64% vs IDGT's -77.95%.
On 3-year performance, IDGT leads with 25.08% vs 18.64% for BULD. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 7.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 25.08% return vs 18.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BULD.
BULD has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.72% for IDGT.
BULD tracks BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BULD and 0.41% for IDGT.
IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BULD and IDGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer