BUL vs. DEUS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BUL (Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF) and DEUS (Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - BUL tracks the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index while DEUS tracks the Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUL returned 10.18%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for DEUS. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BUL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DEUS.

Performance

BUL vs. DEUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUL achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly lower than DEUS's 15.12% return.

BUL

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: 9.52%
• YTD: 11.05%
• 1Y: 21.64%
• 3Y*: 19.41%
• 5Y*: 10.18%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.03%

DEUS

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.31%
• 6M: 10.90%
• YTD: 15.12%
• 1Y: 21.03%
• 3Y*: 14.88%
• 5Y*: 9.89%
• 10Y*: 11.33%
• ALL TIME*: 11.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	$396.12K	$366.07K	$502.18K
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF	$618.40K	$852.23K	$985.08K

BUL vs. DEUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	11.05%	19.18%	27.39%	3.68%	-16.18%	32.48%	27.26%	4.81%
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF	15.12%	10.41%	14.33%	14.73%	-11.18%	26.31%	8.81%	10.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BUL and DEUS is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2019	0.84

The correlation between BUL and DEUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUL vs. DEUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUL	DEUS
Consumer Cyclical	28.2%	11.1%
Healthcare	27.8%	12.9%
Technology	21.9%	10.5%
Basic Materials	9.1%	4.1%
Energy	5.5%	5.2%
Industrials	3.2%	18.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	7.5%
Communication Services	1.5%	3.2%
Financial Services	-	13.8%
Real Estate	-	5.6%
Utilities	-	7.4%

Return for Risk

BUL vs. DEUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUL

BUL Risk / Return Rank: 57
BUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BUL Omega Ratio Rank: 48
BUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BUL Martin Ratio Rank: 67

DEUS

DEUS Risk / Return Rank: 80
DEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
DEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUL vs. DEUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUL	DEUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.79	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	2.65	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.31	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	2.92	-0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.20	11.25	-3.06

BUL vs. DEUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the DEUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUL and DEUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUL vs. DEUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUL drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, smaller than the maximum DEUS drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUL and DEUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUL	DEUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-40.47%	+3.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-6.83%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.55%	-16.69%	-6.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.85%	-20.89%	-6.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-1.53%	+1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-4.28%	-3.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	1.77%	+0.76%

Volatility

BUL vs. DEUS - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) at 3.09%. This indicates that BUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUL	DEUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	3.09%	+1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.94%	8.23%	+4.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.00%	11.17%	+5.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.90%	15.49%	+6.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.11%	17.95%	+6.16%

BUL vs. DEUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DEUS's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUL vs. DEUS - Dividend Comparison

BUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than DEUS's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	0.21%	0.28%	0.30%	2.11%	0.67%	0.08%	0.69%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF	1.38%	1.59%	1.36%	1.49%	1.74%	1.14%	1.61%	1.65%	1.77%	1.31%	2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUL and DEUS in my portfolio?

BUL and DEUS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUL or DEUS?

BUL has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to DEUS (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUL dropped -37.08% vs DEUS's -40.47%.

Which ETF is better, BUL or DEUS?

On 5-year performance, BUL leads with 10.18% vs 9.89% for DEUS. On fees, DEUS is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DEUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUL or DEUS?

Over the 5-year period, BUL has performed better with a 10.18% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUL or DEUS?

DEUS is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUL or DEUS?

DEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.21% for BUL.

What is the main difference between BUL and DEUS?

BUL tracks Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index, while DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BUL and 0.17% for DEUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DEUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.