AOTG vs. QDVO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO).

AOTG and QDVO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOTG is an actively managed fund by AOT. It was launched on Jun 28, 2022. QDVO is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Aug 22, 2024.

Performance

AOTG vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AOTG vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	-14.87%	25.26%	12.75%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	-5.75%	20.16%	11.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a -14.87% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's -5.75% return.

AOTG

• 1D: 4.48%
• 1M: -4.09%
• YTD: -14.87%
• 6M: -13.08%
• 1Y: 21.50%
• 3Y*: 21.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDVO

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: -5.75%
• 6M: -3.27%
• 1Y: 20.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTG vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.

AOTG

AOT Growth and Innovation ETF

QDVO

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF

Return for Risk

AOTG vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTG

AOTG Risk / Return Rank: 41
AOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
AOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
AOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
AOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 74
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTG vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOTG	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	1.12	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	1.77	-0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.25	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	2.07	-1.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.80	7.80	-5.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOTG vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOTG and QDVO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOTG	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	1.12	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.89	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between AOTG and QDVO is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AOTG vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.26%.

	TTM	2025	2024
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	11.26%	9.92%	2.79%

Drawdowns

AOTG vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and QDVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOTG	QDVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.63%	-17.75%	-13.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.85%	-10.24%	-12.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.40%	-7.50%	-11.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.99%	-2.50%	-5.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.37%	2.71%	+4.66%

Volatility

AOTG vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) at 5.31%. This indicates that AOTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOTG	QDVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.02%	5.31%	+3.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.01%	9.74%	+9.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.09%	18.60%	+10.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.41%	18.02%	+11.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.41%	18.02%	+11.39%