AOTG vs. FNCL
Compare and contrast key facts about AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL).
AOTG and FNCL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOTG is an actively managed fund by AOT. It was launched on Jun 28, 2022. FNCL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013.
Performance
AOTG vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AOTG vs. FNCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | -14.87% | 25.26% | 32.20% | 54.58% | -11.53% |
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | -9.17% | 14.94% | 30.44% | 14.10% | 7.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a -14.87% return, which is significantly lower than FNCL's -9.17% return.
AOTG
- 1D
- 4.48%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- -14.87%
- 6M
- -13.08%
- 1Y
- 21.50%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNCL
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- -9.17%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- 2.69%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOTG vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AOTG vs. FNCL — Risk / Return Rank
AOTG
FNCL
AOTG vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOTG | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.14 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 0.32 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.05 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 0.26 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 0.79 | +2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOTG | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.14 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.52 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTG and FNCL is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AOTG vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison
AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | 1.75% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.91% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.37% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 2.17% |
Drawdowns
AOTG vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum FNCL drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and FNCL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTG | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -44.38% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.85% | -14.78% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.40% | -11.94% | -7.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.99% | -6.89% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.37% | 4.92% | +2.45% |
Volatility
AOTG vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) at 4.88%. This indicates that AOTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AOTG | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.02% | 4.88% | +4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.01% | 11.75% | +7.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.09% | 20.02% | +9.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.41% | 19.34% | +10.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.41% | 22.35% | +7.06% |