BUG vs. PXQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ).
BUG and PXQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2019. PXQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Networking Intellidex Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2005. Both BUG and PXQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BUG vs. PXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BUG vs. PXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | -17.56% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.55% |
PXQ Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF | 3.66% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 21.83% | 39.14% | 5.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a -17.56% return, which is significantly lower than PXQ's 3.66% return.
BUG
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -17.56%
- 6M
- -28.62%
- 1Y
- -22.33%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
PXQ
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 39.27%
- 3Y*
- 23.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 16.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUG vs. PXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PXQ's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BUG vs. PXQ — Risk / Return Rank
BUG
PXQ
BUG vs. PXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUG | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | 1.70 | -2.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | 2.39 | -3.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.33 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 3.03 | -3.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 14.17 | -15.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUG | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 | 1.70 | -2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.52 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.48 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG and PXQ is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BUG vs. PXQ - Dividend Comparison
BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than PXQ's 0.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.05% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXQ Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF | 0.90% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
Drawdowns
BUG vs. PXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum PXQ drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and PXQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -57.18% | +15.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.69% | -12.94% | -22.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | -34.55% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.85% | -6.94% | -25.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -10.82% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.33% | 2.76% | +12.57% |
Volatility
BUG vs. PXQ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) have volatilities of 8.65% and 8.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BUG | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.65% | 8.61% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.90% | 15.47% | +4.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.21% | 23.27% | +4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.45% | 22.86% | +4.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 22.72% | +5.98% |