PXQ vs. CHPS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS).
PXQ and CHPS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PXQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Networking Intellidex Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2005. CHPS is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 12, 2023. Both PXQ and CHPS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PXQ vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PXQ vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF | 3.66% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 10.32% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 12.20% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 12.20% return.
PXQ
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 39.27%
- 3Y*
- 23.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 16.17%
CHPS
- 1D
- 5.84%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 33.13%
- 1Y
- 95.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PXQ vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXQ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PXQ vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
PXQ
CHPS
PXQ vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXQ | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 2.55 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 3.10 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 5.39 | -2.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.17 | 18.93 | -4.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXQ | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.55 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.98 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between PXQ and CHPS is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PXQ vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than CHPS's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF | 0.90% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.60% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PXQ vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and CHPS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXQ | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -39.44% | -17.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -17.50% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -12.68% | +5.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -9.63% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 4.98% | -2.22% |
Volatility
PXQ vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) is 8.61%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 13.99%. This indicates that PXQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PXQ | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.61% | 13.99% | -5.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.47% | 26.20% | -10.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.27% | 37.67% | -14.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 32.80% | -9.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 32.80% | -10.08% |