PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUG vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUG vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 29.15% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -0.78% return.


BUG

1D
3.31%
1M
0.03%
6M
37.22%
YTD
29.15%
1Y
16.71%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.13%

BOTZ

1D
2.02%
1M
-3.90%
6M
-2.50%
YTD
-0.78%
1Y
9.01%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.33M$29.66M$37.04M
$54.94M$54.62M$45.09M

BUG vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BUG
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
29.15%-5.04%9.59%41.40%-33.63%13.24%70.83%6.21%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
-0.78%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BUG and BOTZ is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between BUG and BOTZ has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BUG vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUG
BOTZ

Technology

100.0%
30.8%

Communication Services

0.0%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
0.0%

Healthcare

0.0%
8.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

0.9%

Industrials

-

50.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

BUG
100.0%
BOTZ
30.8%

Communication Services

BUG
0.0%
BOTZ
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BUG
0.0%
BOTZ
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

BUG
0.0%
BOTZ
0.0%

Healthcare

BUG
0.0%
BOTZ
8.0%

Basic Materials

BUG

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Energy

BUG

-

BOTZ
0.5%

Financial Services

BUG

-

BOTZ
0.9%

Industrials

BUG

-

BOTZ
50.8%

Real Estate

BUG

-

BOTZ

-

Utilities

BUG

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUG vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUG
BUG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUG vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUGBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.08

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

0.47

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

1.18

-0.14

BUG vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUG and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUG vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUGBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.66%

-55.54%

+13.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.16%

-19.34%

-15.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.69%

-29.02%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.66%

-55.54%

+13.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.31%

-13.65%

+7.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.24%

-18.22%

+3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.10%

7.64%

+8.46%

Volatility

BUG vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a higher volatility of 11.30% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 9.24%. This indicates that BUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUGBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.30%

9.24%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.29%

21.66%

+6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.97%

26.47%

+6.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.05%

27.29%

+1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.49%

25.89%

+3.60%

BUG vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUG vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than BOTZ's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.49%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
BUG
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
0.03%0.04%0.09%0.10%1.56%0.66%0.46%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUG and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUG has higher volatility (11.30%) compared to BOTZ (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 5-year performance, BUG leads with 5.68% vs 1.12% for BOTZ. On fees, BUG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BUG has performed better with a 5.68% return vs 1.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.

BUG is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Artificial Intelligence. BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG and 0.68% for BOTZ.

BUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUG and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer